ClickCease

Apartment Residents Worried About Asbestos Exposure

Removing asbestos from older buildings is extremely dangerous. If not done properly, asbestos fibers can become airborne. This type of asbestos exposure is linked to devastating health outcomes, including lung cancer and mesothelioma. However, before being diagnosed, some people in South Carolina might not even know that they were ever exposed to the deadly substance.

A group of residents at an apartment in another state say they were never warned of possible exposure to asbestos. The asbestos was located in the apartment’s laundry room, which is located in the basement of the building. Residents say they were never notified that work would be going on before the removal process started.

One of the residents only found out that the removal project was for asbestos because she works from home and was there when it started. When the workers left, they put up a sign warning residents to stay out of the basement for at least 24 hours. According to that same woman the basement doors were wide open the next morning. The property manager later sent an email saying that the residents were not at risk because he did not believe that the asbestos ever became airborne.

Asbestos is a cancer-causing substance found in a wide variety of products. Many older buildings are contaminated with the substance, which can become deadly if disturbed. When South Carolina building owners do not adequately warn residents or visitors of possible asbestos exposure or take the correct steps for its removal, they can potentially be held responsible for their actions. Many victims find that pursuing civil suits against these individuals can achieve both necessary compensation as well as a much-needed sense of justice.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Whole Community Still Fears Asbestos Exposure

Working in certain industries can put people at a higher than average risk for being exposed to asbestos. However, being employed in construction or manufacturing is far from the only way to fall victim to asbestos exposure. In some situations, entire neighborhoods and communities might be exposed through no fault of their own.

The residents of a community in a state outside of South Carolina say they are still scared about the lingering effects of asbestos in their neighborhoods. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, asbestos was discovered in the neighborhood back in 2011. The asbestos came from a nearby vermiculite processing plant, which operated between the years of 1953 and 1989. One long-time resident said that there were plenty of unexplainable deaths throughout the decades.

A three-phase cleanup project included soil excavation and taking multiple air and ground samples, and was wrapped up back in Dec. 2016. The full cleanup was being finalized in Jan. 2017. However, residents believe that this might not have been enough. The nearby plant that processed the asbestos-contaminated vermiculite is still standing. Although no longer in operation, there is plenty of concern that it could continue spreading asbestos.

When entire communities are affected by asbestos exposure, the impact can be widespread and devastating. South Carolina families may be unsure of where to turn for help or how to approach the financial aspect of handling the medical expenses of loved ones fighting such a dreaded disease. In some situations, victims and their families choose to pursue civil lawsuits against the parties who caused the exposure, in pursuit of monetary damages incurred as a result of negligent exposure to asbestos.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

EPA Seeks to Limit Asbestos Exposure With New Rule

Despite the fact that the dangerous health effects of asbestos are well understood, it is still imported into the United States. This imported substance is used in a wide range of products that continue to put people in South Carolina at significant risk for asbestos exposure. A new rule from the Environmental Protection Agency could help reduce the risk of exposure to new uses of asbestos.

While many people believe that the United States has a total ban on asbestos, it actually only has a partial ban. That partial ban has allowed the ongoing importation and manufacturing of asbestos, which is frequently used during industrial processes and in specialized products. The EPA proposed its Significant New Use Rule — SNUR — in 2018, which it hoped would close up loopholes that allow ongoing asbestos use. Feedback from safety advocates led the EPA to revise SNUR.

In its current iteration, SNUR will prevent any asbestos use aside from those that are already taking place. It will also make it easier for the EPA to regulate asbestos and any applications for exceptions. Those that request exceptions will also be subjected to an intense safety review as well as additional regulations and restrictions.

New rules and legislation aimed at reducing the risk of asbestos exposure are important, particularly when it comes to the health and well-being of South Carolina residents. Whether from older or newer uses, exposure to asbestos can lead to some devastating diseases. Mesothelioma and lung cancer can be fatal to victims, who often need help getting compensation for their medical bills, lost wages and other damages.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Property Owners Sentenced For Asbestos Exposure

Removing asbestos can be a dangerous undertaking and may put workers and nearby people at risk for exposure. In order to minimize asbestos exposure and the related health risks, removal of the toxic substance is heavily regulated. Some people in South Carolina and elsewhere view this regulation as more of an annoying roadblock than an important safety measure, and end up making decisions that land them in trouble with the law.

In 2015, a pair of brothers purchased a property that they knew contained asbestos. Reportedly 35 and 39 years of age, they were told by their realtor that it would be costly to have the asbestos properly removed. Another potential buyer had apparently backed out of the purchase when he received a $117,000 bid to safely remove the asbestos in the right manner. The brothers moved ahead with the purchase.

According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office, the brothers hired a crew to demolish areas of their building that were contaminated with significant levels of asbestos. Not only did workers not use proper methods for safe removal such as negative air pressure and protective sheeting, but they were also not equipped with the right safety gear. The workers were given masks and suits to wear, but neither were approved for asbestos protection, which left them vulnerable to exposure.

The property owners were recently sentenced for the illegal removal of asbestos. Both will serve a year for probation, perform 50 hours for community service and pay a $9,500 fine. However, no amount of criminal consequences can undo the asbestos exposure that workers and other people likely suffered. This is why it can be so important for victims of exposure in South Carolina to hold negligent individuals responsible for their actions. Not only can successful claims achieve compensation for things like mesothelioma and lung cancer, but they can also force companies to be more responsible when dealing with toxic substances like asbestos.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Improved Labeling Could Prevent Some Asbestos Exposure

Following the discovery of asbestos in some of the cosmetic products sold by the retailer Claire’s, some members of the U.S. Congress are pushing for improved warning labels on potentially dangerous products. Asbestos exposure is especially serious as it can lead to fatal illnesses decades in the future. Better labeling practices could give South Carolina consumers the power and confidence to choose products that are free from asbestos.

Representative Debbie Dingell recently introduced legislation that would require companies to place warning labels on products that could possibly contain asbestos. Representative Jan Schakowsky co-sponsored the bill. The CEO and president of the Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization Linda Reinstein also spoke out in support of the bill, saying that it would help parents protect their children from dangerous products.

The Environmental Working Group also supports the new legislation for asbestos warning. According to the EWG there are thousands of products that contain talc, which comes from the same type of rock as asbestos. Talc is often contaminated with asbestos, and many people believe consumers should be warned of the likelihood of exposure that stems from talc products. When considering the 15,000 annual deaths linked to asbestos exposure, improved warning labels could make a marked change in safety for consumers.

There is no denying the dangerous and devastating effects of asbestos exposure. From lung cancer to mesothelioma, many victims do not even realize that they were exposed to the toxic substance until they begin to develop symptoms. Better labeling systems might help prevent some of these deaths, but until such a time, victims and their families in South Carolina can seek compensation for their illnesses through civil lawsuits.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Do You Know the Most Common Form of Mesothelioma?

You may have already known that asbestos is toxic and tried to avoid it, or maybe you had never even heard of the substance before receiving a life-altering diagnosis. The fatal cancer mesothelioma is unfortunately not an uncommon outcome of asbestos exposure. Mesothelioma can present in several different forms, but pleural mesothelioma is the most common in South Carolina.

Despite being the most common type of mesothelioma, pleural mesothelioma often goes undiagnosed for significant periods of time. This is due to a number of factors, including the sometimes lengthy delay between exposure and the onset of the disease. Once victims start to develop symptoms they are often misdiagnosed because of how similar pleural mesothelioma symptoms are to that of other diseases.

There are not many treatment options available to victims of pleural mesothelioma. Despite being the most common type of this cancer, treatment is often fickle. When diagnosed early enough, treatments like chemotherapy, radiation and even surgery can be helpful in extending patients’ lifespans. For those who received their diagnoses too late, palliative care is usually the only option.

There is no way to undo the harm caused by careless manufacturers, employers and industrial companies. This does not mean that you do not deserve justice for your mesothelioma diagnosis. In South Carolina, it is possible to seek compensation through a civil lawsuit, which can lead to compensation for medical bills, pain and suffering, economic damages and much more. If you need more information about pleural mesothelioma or other diseases related to asbestos, our website has a wide range of resources.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Hundreds of Students Displaced After Asbestos Exposure

Students and parents alike tend to expect schools to be safe places that are free from serious threats and risks. Sadly, this is not always the case. Older school buildings can pose various dangers, especially when poor upkeep contributes to things like hidden mold or dangerous stairwells. Another hidden risk in many old schools? The possibility of asbestos exposure.

Following the discovery of asbestos, students at a school in a state outside of South Carolina have been displaced for approximately one month. The problem began during Feb. 2019, when the school announced that asbestos-contaminated plaster had been breached during construction work. It is not clear when the breach occurred, but the school acted quickly to move its students and staff once the problem was discovered.

Hundreds of students and staff members moved into a makeshift space. The school initially told students and their parents that the move was a temporary matter that would probably last only a few weeks. A recent announcement that students will remain in the temporary space until the end of the school year apparently has some parents on edge, with some possibly wondering if the problem is much more serious than a bit of breached plaster.

Asbestos exposure is commonly known to be dangerous and potentially fatal. Victims can develop serious health issues like mesothelioma years or even decades down the line. Receiving such a diagnosis can be devastating for South Carolina victims, but many find that pursuing compensation from negligent parties can help them address the mental, physical and financial burden of such an illness.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Frequently Asked Questions About Mesothelioma

We recently published a SlideShare titled Frequently Asked Questions About Mesothelioma.

If you have further questions or wish to speak to an attorney about your options after a mesothelioma diagnosis, please call us at 866-548-6868.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

No Recall for Claire’s Products Linked to Asbestos Exposure

Many women, teenagers and even young girls in South Carolina can recount going to a Claire’s store to have their ears pierced. The popular chain not only provides ear piercing services, it also sells a wide variety of items marketed to young girls. Unfortunately, some of those products likely resulted in asbestos exposure.

The Food and Drug Administration recently released a warning for consumers. According to the FDA, Claire’s is currently selling makeup products that contain the toxic substance asbestos. Perhaps even more upsetting than this realization is that Claire’s refuses to issue a voluntary recall on the affected products. It is unclear why the company will not pull the products from its shelves since it issued a recall for similar issues in early 2018.

The alarm over asbestos-contaminated makeup aimed at young girls was raised after a round of independent testing. It is not clear what concerns led to this testing, although Claire’s conducted its own independent asbestos testing when it issued its 2018 recall. The FDA currently does not have the authority to force the company to issue a recall and is instead warning consumers against purchasing or using the affected products.

Asbestos exposure is no small matter. Victims can develop serious health issues from asbestos, including lung cancer and the fatal cancer mesothelioma. In many cases, victims live for years before developing any symptoms. This can make tracking down the line of exposure difficult for the average person in South Carolina, which is why many victims choose to work with an experienced attorney when seeking compensation for their damages.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Mesothelioma Victim, Wife File Suit for Asbestos Exposure

South Carolina patients who develop serious, life-threatening medical issues suffer more than just physical symptoms. Many deal with ongoing and severe emotional distress related to their illnesses. This is often true for patients dealing with mesothelioma, a fatal cancer caused by exposure to asbestos. Some victims decide to channel their emotional distress toward holding those responsible for their asbestos exposure accountable.

An elderly wife and her husband with mesothelioma filed a suit against more than a dozen defendants. According to the claim, the husband began working during the 1950s. During his decades of work, he says that he was routinely and repeatedly exposed to asbestos fibers, which he inhaled and ingested. The defendants — including Ameron International — allegedly sold, distributed, manufactured or installed the asbestos-tainted products. He also asserts that he was never warned of the dangers of asbestos or given any guidance on its safe handling.

The victim points out that all he had done was pursue a normal course of employment when, through no fault of his own, he was exposed to large amounts of asbestos. He and his wife claim that his resulting mesothelioma diagnosis caused him to suffer both physical pain and mental anguish. As a result, the suit also claims that the wife has lost the companionship of her husband.

Asbestos is an extremely unsafe substance that can lead to devastating outcomes. Although money can never undo the harm caused by negligent asbestos exposure, compensation can go a long way for South Carolina victims with mesothelioma. Any resulting legal recourse might be applied to medical bills, lost wages, physical and emotional trauma and more.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts