ClickCease

Family Secures $18.5 Million Re Loved One’s Asbestos Exposure

Facing the death of a loved one is rarely an easy process, but it can be especially difficult when their death was the result of another’s negligence. When dealing with asbestos exposure, this often involves families losing their loved ones to extremely devastating diseases, such as mesothelioma and lung cancer. Some of these families in South Carolina choose to pursue compensation on behalf of their loved ones.

A jury in a different state recently awarded $18.5 million to a family whose loved one had developed mesothelioma. Their suit claimed that while working at a brake shop from 1971 to 1983, the victim had performed as many as 12 brake jobs per day. The brakes that he worked on were lined with asbestos, which he was neither warned of or provided safety gear for.

The mesothelioma diagnosis came in March 2017, and he died later that same year. His family’s suit named not only the company that owned the brake shop for which the man had worked, but also Ford Motor Co. and two other companies. Those other two companies settled out of court, and Ford was ultimately not found responsible.

All three of the victim’s surviving children received $1 million for anguish. This was on top of nearly $342,000 for medical expenses related to his asbestos exposure and $5 million for pain and suffering. Additional awards — including $10 million for punitive damages — were also awarded by the jury.

Asbestos exposure is deadly, but it can take years and even decades before related symptoms begin to develop. Because of this, victims in South Carolina might struggle to demonstrate negligence as they try to seek compensation for their injuries. Because of this and the sometimes time-sensitive nature of these illnesses, working with an experienced attorney can be helpful for some victims and their families.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

University Apologizes For Decades of Asbestos Exposure

Long-term health issues are just one concern of unexpected exposure to the toxic substance asbestos. South Carolina victims might also face financial issues when dealing with medical bills for mesothelioma or lung cancer care, which can also require them to take time off work. But what about when the impact of asbestos exposure is more immediate. For students and employees of one major university, questions of what to do in the wake of asbestos exposure are lingering.

Officials at the out-of-state university discovered what they called unacceptable levels of asbestos in one of the campus buildings. The building housed multiple offices as well as an on-campus preschool. Although the university ultimately closed the building as a preventative measure, some parents are not pleased with the school’s actions. Parents of children who attend the preschool claim that the university waited too long between discovering the asbestos and relocating the preschool classroom to a new area.

A University of Montana employee says he spent 25 years working in the building, and now fears for his safety. He claims that he has spent the last year dealing with ongoing wheezing and coughing symptoms, which he fears could be related to the years of exposure he likely suffered. Another concerned individual wondered whether he should get rid of his couch or other belongings at home because his daughter might have accidentally brought home asbestos fibers from preschool.

The university has since pledged its support to those who were exposed to asbestos, promising support to those who develop health problems even decades down the line. However, setting up these types of support systems can be complicated, and even victims who otherwise qualify for help sometimes have trouble gaining access. When South Carolina victims develop serious health consequences because of asbestos exposure, it is sometimes necessary to pursue a civil claim against the negligent party in order to recover compensation.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Couple blames lung cancer on asbestos exposure

Asbestos is often considered a problem of the past that few people South Carolina need to worry about. However, asbestos is still used in a wide range of products and new exposures are still a frightening reality. Additionally, because of the of the nature of how asbestos exposure causes damage, those who had a problem with it in the past have to worry about the consequences now.

A married couple from another state recently filed a lawsuit against multiple defendants, including Borg-Warner Morse TEC LLC. According to their claim, the husband was routinely exposed to asbestos during his working career during the 1960s and ’70s. He says the exposure was both inhaled and ingested.

The named defendants allegedly manufactured and distributed products that contained asbestos even when there were well-suited alternatives available. Additionally, the victim claims that the products he used while working did not come with instructions regarding their safe handling or warnings that they contained asbestos. He allegedly spent decades working with these types of products without ever fully understanding the risk he was at. He was later diagnosed with lung cancer.

The couple blame his lung cancer on the decades of asbestos exposure that he suffered. This is unfortunately a common outcome for South Carolina victims. Mesothelioma is an incurable lung cancer attributed to asbestos exposure, and it is a frightening reality for many people. Compensation from successfully pursued civil suits can help victims address the financial damages associated with their illness, as well as the emotional and physical suffering that come along with it.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Parents worried about asbestos exposure at school

Parents generally expect that their children will be safe at school, but this is sadly not always the case. Some school buildings — particularly those that are older — are filled with dangerous substances, such as asbestos, that must be removed as the building ages. However, this could put many South Carolina school children at risk for asbestos exposure, which could lead to future health problems.

An out-of-state school recently came under fire for its plans to deal with asbestos abatement. The asbestos is located in the caulking around the building’s windows. While the school insists that the risk associated with asbestos in this type of caulking is low, it apparently did not do a good job of communicating what was going on to parents. Many parents did not discover what was going on until days before the abatement was set to begin, which did not give them time to fully express their concerns, especially since the school performed unapproved removal of asbestos back in 2017.

The school told parents that the current abatement process will only be performed after school hours. However, some parents pointed out that this does not necessarily protect children who are enrolled in after-school programs on the campus. Approximately 100 parents expressed their intentions to keep their children home from school during the asbestos work.

South Carolina parents have a right to be worried about their children’s safety in such situations. Asbestos exposure can lead to serious and even fatal health consequences decades down the road, such as lung cancer and mesothelioma. When a person or company negligently exposes victims to this toxic substance, it is sometimes necessary to take action in the form of a carefully pursued civil suit.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Woman’s Lung Cancer Diagnosis Linked to Asbestos Exposure

Many people already understand that exposure to asbestos can cause victims to develop the deadly cancer mesothelioma. But what about other serious health effects? One woman points to asbestos exposure as the root cause behind her lung cancer diagnosis.

The woman — who does not live in South Carolina — and her husband filed a suit over the May 2018 diagnosis. While they believe that repeated and routine exposure to asbestos caused her to develop lung cancer, they do not believe that a single company or manufacturer was responsible. Instead, their suit cites over 40 defendants who allegedly manufactured or sold products containing asbestos.

The exposure apparently began when the wife first went to work back in 1969, when she was routinely exposed to many different products that caused her to unknowingly inhale asbestos fibers. According to their claim, the named defendants intentionally used asbestos in their products despite knowing that asbestos fibers are extremely toxic. They also accused the defendants of failing to provide consumers with adequate warnings regarding the potentially fatal side effects from using their products. It is not clear if her employers ever provided any information regarding asbestos safety, either.

Together they are seeking compensation in excess of $50,000. It is not uncommon for a South Carolina victim and his or her spouse to initiate a claim together. This is largely because the surviving spouse is also impacted by the devastating effects of asbestos exposure, including the financial impact of losing a partner as well as emotional trauma.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Where Is Asbestos Exposure Likely To Occur?

Protecting oneself from asbestos might seem easy enough, but few people realize the truly astounding number of products that still contain this deadly substance. Asbestos exposure can occur at work, in the home or in any number of places because of its still relatively widespread use or leftover remnants from decades past. Here are a few places to watch out for asbestos.

It is true that there are federal regulations that limit how and when asbestos can be used, but that does not mean that it is never used. While workers in certain industries — including construction and manufacturing — might be vaguely aware of the issue, it is widespread enough for everyone in South Carolina to understand the dangers. Consider some of the following products that commonly contain the deadly fiber asbestos:

  • Some textiles
  • Cigarette filters
  • Motor vehicle brake linings
  • Patching and spackling products
  • Cement
  • Gardening materials
  • Fireproofing items
  • Ceiling and floor tiles, shingles, home siding and more

Many people encounter these products on a regular basis, if not daily. Despite this, few know the type of danger they are facing. Since it is important to exercise extreme caution when coming into contact with any type of product that possibly contains asbestos, it is essential for more people in South Carolina to learn about these products.

Lung cancer, mesothelioma and other deadly medical conditions can all develop after asbestos exposure. Unfortunately, many victims are not aware of their exposure until they begin to develop the devastating health effects. However, even if victims do not realize when exposure is happening, they may still be able to seek compensation when they discover this fact later on. However, the help of an experienced attorney is essential for demonstrating proof of that exposure and the consequential damages incurred.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Neighbors at Risk of Asbestos Exposure After illegal Demolition

Despite the limits the government has placed on the use of asbestos in building supplies, the danger remains. Many older homes and structures in South Carolina were built with asbestos-containing materials in their floors, walls, roofs and other places. As long as the materials are undisturbed, there is less danger. However, when the particles are disturbed, for example during a renovation, everyone around is at risk of asbestos exposure.

A demolition company in another state was scheduled to raze an abandoned house known to be full of asbestos on a residential block. In accordance with state and federal laws, an asbestos abatement contractor attempted numerous times to contact the foreman of the demolition project to urgently warn him to wait until they had prepared the house for a safe demolition. The foreman did not respond to the emails but went ahead with the demolition, sending a cloud of toxic particles into the neighborhood.

Additionally, officials reported that the debris remaining at the site after the demolition was obviously filled with asbestos that had not been watered down or contained, allowing it to become airborne. Inhaling or ingesting even a small quantity of asbestos particles can result in deadly lung diseases such as incurable mesothelioma and lung cancer. The demolition company responsible for the hazard is likely facing serious penalties.

The symptoms of mesothelioma may not become obvious for decades after asbestos exposure. However, those signs are painful and frightening. Those in South Carolina facing medical issues related to asbestos may have legal options. Speaking with an attorney is the first step to learning about one’s alternatives.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Proving Asbestos Exposure Isn’t An Impossible Task

We recently published a SlideShare discussing the issue of proving asbestos exposure.

This is a concern for many who are diagnosed with mesothelioma, especially considering that asbestos exposure may have occurred several decades ago.

Please view our SlideShare for more information, and contact us if you wish to discuss your concerns with an attorney.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Johnson & Johnson Allegedly Knew About Asbestos Exposure

Asbestos, a toxic, cancer-causing substance, is well-known to be dangerous to human health. This is not new information to anyone in South Carolina, and yet for decades Johnson & Johnson allegedly knew that their products were contaminated with asbestos, and said nothing. Evidence indicates that the company actively tried to cover up ongoing asbestos exposure suffered by their customers.

Johnson & Johnson uses talc in its popular baby powder product, which many women use on not only their children, but also themselves. Talc has not been totally proven to be safe, but it is often contaminated with asbestos. This is because asbestos is frequently found wherever talc is mined, making contamination a frightening reality. According to one report, completely purifying talc is impossible.

Various global health organizations recognize that asbestos is a carcinogen that causes ovarian cancer and mesothelioma. That did not stop Johnson & Johnson from misleading the Federal Drug Administration back in the 1970s, when it hid testing results that showed asbestos had been found in its baby powder. The company spent decades insisting that even when asbestos was present in its products that they were still totally safe for consumers to use.

The women who have since filed lawsuits against the company say otherwise. Women who used Johnson & Johnson’s baby powder for years or even decades before developing ovarian cancer are trying to hold the company responsible for its actions that put them and countless others at risk for serious health issues. However, the company still claims it did nothing wrong, and at this point it is unclear if it will continue to manufacture its iconic and possibly dangerous iconic product.

Consumers have a right to purchase products that are free from hidden dangers. When companies like Johnson & Johnson actively hide knowledge regarding possible asbestos exposure, it is South Carolina consumers who suffer. While the damage may have already been done, victims can pursue legal compensation for their injuries which, if successful, can also help influence change that protects future consumers.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Library Demolition May Cause Widespread Asbestos Exposure

Despite its once prevalent use in construction, most people in South Carolina now understand just how dangerous asbestos is. As such, communities have an understandable right to be concerned when they learn of a potential source of asbestos exposure or contamination. For one community in a different state, there are mounting worries in regard to the demolition of an old library.

Demolition began on the closed library on Dec. 3, 2018, although it was starkly opposed by members of the community. The building contained asbestos in several different areas, including in the floors, roof and fireproofing materials. The original plan was to have a crew carefully remove the asbestos before demolition, but it ended up being condemned back in September, and officials determined it would not be safe for workers to remove the asbestos.

Demolition plans switched to a controlled abatement, which alarmed many people in the community. This process involves continuously spraying the work site with water to prevent any airborne asbestos contamination. However, this leads to contaminated water that workers must contain and filter; otherwise they risk contaminating nearby soil or groundwater.

Unfortunately, even when South Carolina communities raise serious and valid concerns, their opinions are often disregarded. When dangerous demolitions result in asbestos exposure, it is those nearby communities that often suffer the hardest hits. It is important for potential victims to keep rigorous notes and records of any ill health effects they experience after an exposure. Doing so may come in handy if they develop any of the number of related diseases years down the road.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts