ClickCease

3 Common Products That May Still Contain Asbestos

People are often surprised to find out that exposure to asbestos is still a significant issue in the United States. It might seem that in the 40+ years since the Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 gave the EPA broad authority to regulate asbestos production, the issue should be largely resolved. But exposure to asbestos continues to be a risk, and the cause of serious illness for those with extended or intense exposure to the dangerous substance.

In 2015 the Environmental Working Group Action Fund released a study estimating that up to 15,000 Americans still die every year as a result of illnesses caused by exposure to asbestos.

The answer as to why asbestos risk isn’t a thing of the past has to do with just how common the use of asbestos has been, and for how long.

The production of asbestos as a heat and fire-resistant material is not an industry that is tens or hundreds of years old, but thousands. It is literally as old as the pyramids of Egypt, with asbestos having been used in embalming techniques for pharaohs.

The reality is that asbestos is highly controlled but its use is not actually illegal. While the most common kinds of serious exposure are still related to construction and industrial jobs, even now the hazardous substance occasionally can be found in consumer products, including those marketed to children.

How Dangerous Is Asbestos?

The potential for health risks associated with exposure to asbestos was first theorized in the late 1800s, and the first death directly attributed to the substance occurred in the early 1900s. Even today, according to the World Health Organization, about 125 million people worldwide are exposed to asbestos at the workplace, and while it’s impossible to put an exact number to how many people have died as a result of exposure, in the U.S. alone it is certainly well above 100,000.

The danger from asbestos comes as the result of its extremely brittle and fibrous nature, where every visible strand of the substance is made up of millions more microscopic strands. When inhaled, these microscopic “fibrils” get trapped in the lungs and cause chronic inflammation, potentially leading to a wide range of illnesses including mesothelioma, lung cancer and asbestosis.

However, according the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the hazard of serious illness is related to both the length and the intensity of the exposure. There is no completely safe asbestos exposure, but the hazard for serious illness drops substantially if a person is only exposed once, particularly if it is only to a very small amount.

The reality is that almost everyone in the U.S. has or will have encountered asbestos at some point in their life. The vast majority of these brief encounters with asbestos will have no serious long-term effects. But that shouldn’t prevent people from trying to limit those encounters, and it certainly shouldn’t be a license for consumer products to expose their customers to hazardous materials.

As a rule, there is no exposure to asbestos that is completely safe.

Asbestos in Consumer Goods

The use of asbestos in consumer goods has primarily been as a method for making something less flammable or resistant to heat. While that use was much more common prior to the regulation restrictions imposed in the 1970s, asbestos still occasionally shows up in all kinds of products, particularly those that require some degree of resistance to heat.

Here are just a few common consumer items where asbestos has been found often as recently as 2018.

Asbestos in Crayons – In August of 2018 a consumer group reported traces of asbestos being found in crayons sold under the Playskool brand. The story noted that as recently as 2015, trace amounts of asbestos had been found in crayons from numerous major brands including Disney & Nickelodeon. The most recent findings, however, had been discovered in crayons sold at Dollar Tree locations.

Spokespeople for both the retailer and the Playskool brand promised to investigate the report which included concerns about other hazardous chemicals included in a range of products.

Asbestos in Talcum Powder – Talcum power is created from the naturally occurring mineral talc. Asbestos can also naturally occur within talc. When talc is used to make a consumer product, that asbestos must be removed or it can end up in the final product. It is important to note that the manufacturers of consumer talcum powder all claim that there is no asbestos in the final product.

Throughout 2018, Johnson & Johnson has been having to make that case in court, facing litigation in several states. In July, a judge ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay $4.7 billion dollars to a group of 22 women who claimed that the company’s talcum powder contained asbestos leading to ovarian cancer for the plaintiffs. The company is appealing the decision, and has successfully defended their position in similar trials in other jurisdictions. In January, Johnson & Johnson will face a similar case in court in Manhattan, New York.

Asbestos in Makeup – In January of 2018, the retailer Claire’s pulled 17 products off the store’s shelves after makeup including some products specifically marketed to children was found to contain asbestos. The culprit in this case was again the use of contaminated talc, which is frequently used in cosmetics. The talc that was used in products such as glitter and eye shadow for kids, contained trace amounts of asbestos.

As late as March of 2018, the FDA was continuing to investigate new claims that cosmetics being sold by the retailer contained asbestos. During the investigation, Claire’s released a statement questioning the findings and claimed that all products sold by the company were safe. In addition, Claire’s filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 in March. The retailer exited bankruptcy in October after eliminating $1.9 billion dollars of debt.

Asbestos is Still Out There

As a law firm specializing in representing mesothelioma clients and others who have been exposed to the devastating damage that can be caused by asbestos, we’ve seen firsthand the reality of the ongoing danger posed by the material. The dangers of asbestos exposure for industrial workers, miners and even consumers is far from gone.

There is a perception in the public that asbestos is a banned substance, which for many countries is true. But in the United States the use of asbestos is heavily regulated but not outright forbidden. While the last asbestos mine in the U.S. closed more than a decade ago, there is still much work to be done to eliminate the risk of exposure for everyone.

If you believe your exposure to asbestos has led to a serious illness, we are happy to answer your questions and discuss what options are available for you and your family.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Man Started illegal Fire, Community Suffered Asbestos Exposure

Asbestos is a highly toxic substance, which is why rules and regulations regarding its proper disposal are so incredibly important. Unfortunately, many South Carolina businessmen and women prefer to prioritize their own bottom lines over having to pay for the right methods of disposal. In a recent out-of-state incident, a man allegedly caused an entire community to suffer from asbestos exposure because of his actions.

Back in Feb. 2017, the business owner created an enormous mound full of brush waste and mobile homes. Reports indicate that the trash mound was approximately 20 feet tall, and contained at least five old mobile homes. The area’s fire chief had apparently already warned the man not to burn the old homes, who even asked the city for permission to do so but was ultimately denied.

Despite this, he set the pile of trash on fire at 3 a.m., perhaps expecting that it would burn off before the dawn. Unfortunately, the fire raged on for over a week. Inspectors from that state’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration witnessed the mound continuing to smolder through the end of March 2017. Samples of the debris were later collected and tested positive for asbestos. The businessman could now face of more than $100,000 in fines for the fire.

There is no safe level of asbestos exposure in humans, and the substance is known to cause cancer and other serious health issues. When the negligence of a person or business leads to unnecessary exposure, South Carolina victims can seek compensation for financial, emotional and medical damages through a civil lawsuit. However, since health problems can take years to develop, victims may want to keep careful records of medical tests and treatments as soon as they are made aware of the exposure.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Fines Issued for Asbestos Exposure at Hotel Renovation

Renovations are often billed as exciting changes for the future, but in some cases they can be deadly. Because of the once widespread use of asbestos in South Carolina and across the rest of the nation, exposure during renovations are sadly not uncommon. Indeed, three companies were recently fined for asbestos exposure that occurred during renovations of an out-of-state hotel.

Renovations were apparently well under way on the 107-year-old building when inspectors discovered something troubling. Air quality indicated that asbestos material had been improperly handled and disposed of, potentially exposing many people to the toxic substance. The findings were so troubling that the state’s labor agency immediately shut down construction so that investigators could look into the matter. The investigation lasted about three months, during which time renovations were at a standstill.

Based on the findings from that investigation, three companies were slapped with fines totaling approximately $140,000. Fines were levied for issues like general and serious violations of worker safety and a over a dozen violations of regulations regarding the handling of hazardous materials. Renovations have since resumed, with the owner of the hotel predicting that it will be open sometime during the spring of 2019.

Unfortunately, many companies prioritize time and profits over the safety of workers and the general public. When asbestos exposure threatens the well-being of South Carolina residents, the resulting aftermath can be more than just costly — it can be deadly. Compensation from successfully pursued civil can help asbestos victims address the costs of mesothelioma, lung cancer and other related health problems.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Is Asbestos Exposure A Thing of The Past?

Construction workers, those in the manufacturing industry and many others in South Carolina, frequently work with strange-sounding chemicals and substances but never develop cancer. So what makes asbestos exposure so different in this regard? Asbestos is well-understood to be a durable material that is extremely dangerous to human health.

Asbestos is not only durable, but is also extremely resistant to heat and a good insulator. Because of this, it was once widely used in an untold number of products, including brake pads, construction materials and much, much more. Unfortunately, that durable nature also makes it extremely hazardous.

When inhaled, asbestos dust can settle in the lungs, contributing to a number of serious illnesses. Mesothelioma — a fatal cancer — is perhaps most well-known, but it is certainly not the only danger. Asbestosis is a condition in which the dust causes permanent fibrous scarring in a person’s lungs. These disease most frequently occur in individuals who suffer long-term exposure.

Despite attempts dating back in 1989 to heavily restrict new uses of asbestos, it is still commonly used with fewer restrictions than people might expect. This means that there may be many people in South Carolina who are at risk for asbestos exposure without realizing it. Individuals who suspect that they may have been exposed to this toxic substance should consider keeping careful and detailed records as early on as possible. By documenting known or suspected exposures, health issues and more, victims may be more prepared to pursue necessary compensation in the future.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Parents Understandably Concerned About Asbestos Exposure and Mold

Like most good parents in other states, South Carolina parents of elementary-age school children expect school administrators and faculty to do all they can to keep their children safe when classes are in session during the school year. Many parents of students in one particular school in another state say they are unsure whether that is being done. In fact, they are quite concerned about asbestos exposure and mold issues that remain ongoing at their children’s school and have been for some time.

The situation began to unfold back in February when the school’s roof sprung a leak. Such needed repairs should come as no surprise in a building that was constructed in 1955. The leak, however, was not the only problem. When the roof was being inspected, asbestos and mold were found.

The school was shut down the following month to address the issues. Parents were reportedly told the rest of the problem would be taken care of over the summer. However, it is now October 2018 and the problems are apparently still occurring. One parent, who wished to remain anonymous, stated that even the janitors’ union kept workers from their duties at the school, saying current conditions are simply far too unsafe.

Both mold and asbestos exposure are associated with many serious health problems. School officials told parents that classes are going to resume, and doors will be kept open and dehumidifiers running to create clean air space; many parents say those solutions are not enough to keep their children safe. Any South Carolina parent worried about similar issues at his or her child’s school may wish to discuss the matter with an experienced personal injury attorney, preferably one that has asbestos litigation experience.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

What are Mesothelioma Bankruptcy Trusts?

Mesothelioma is caused by exposure to asbestos. Many people develop mesothelioma due to workplace asbestos exposure that occurred decades ago.

When a person is diagnosed with mesothelioma, the victim and his or her family members may be eligible for significant compensation. Victims can hold negligent companies accountable for the asbestos exposure that caused their disease even if it was decades ago at their place of work.

Many of the companies that produced asbestos products ended up filing bankruptcy decades ago, but that doesn’t mean they are off the hook for the mesothelioma caused by their products.

Depending on the type of bankruptcy filed, many of these companies were required to set up bankruptcy trust funds. This was done to help ensure that those who would be diagnosed with mesothelioma in the future would have options for securing compensation from that company.

Many factors affect how much the victim is eligible to receive, including how much money is in a company’s bankruptcy trust and the criteria for how they disburse funds. These mesothelioma bankruptcy trusts are managed by trustees – not the company that filed bankruptcy.

While commercials sometimes make it seem like a mesothelioma diagnosis guarantees compensation, that is not the case. There are no automatic approvals. Mesothelioma patients need competent asbestos attorneys to prove that the company’s products were the blame for the disease.

Victims of mesothelioma should talk to an attorney to learn what options are available for them. Even if a company no longer, these individuals may still have legal options.

Call Richardson, Patrick, Westbrook & Brickman LLC, today at 866-725-3618 to speak to an asbestos attorney right now.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Where is asbestos exposure most likely to occur?

Mesothelioma is a deadly cancer caused by exposure to the toxic substance asbestos. Every year in the United States, an average of 3,000 people receive a mesothelioma diagnosis. Annual deaths from mesothelioma total about 2,500. Although preventing asbestos exposure from a negligent party can be difficult, people in South Carolina can be more aware of common exposure sites.

Most people think of the military as protectors, but they are putting active duty members and those living near Air Force bases at serious risk for health complications. Asbestos was a common building component for buildings across most air bases and is commonly used in war vehicles and aircrafts. Those living around military bases might not realize that they are potentially exposed to airborne asbestos just by their proximity.

Industrial and commercial sites also pose a common danger. Anything from chemical plants to brewing companies may be harboring hidden asbestos, which is a frequent component of construction for both buildings and heavy equipment. Even if no new asbestos has been introduced, proper asbestos abatement and disposal should be carried out to protect workers.

What about people who do not live near military bases or work in industrial complexes? While these individuals might feel safe, asbestos may be lurking anywhere, including in homes, schools and office work spaces. Older auto parts — such as clutches or brakes — often contain asbestos as well.

The sad reality for many people in South Carolina is that hidden asbestos may be hiding virtually anywhere. In some cases, employers, business owners and manufacturers are even aware of the issue, but do not take necessary steps to warn potential victims or provide necessary safety information. In such cases, these entities can be held responsible for asbestos exposure and resulting health effects through the careful actions of a civil suit.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

U.S. Supreme Court Hears Asbestos Case

The United States Supreme Court recently heard an asbestos-related case, addressing the issue of third-party liability. This is one of the first cases heard by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, the newest member of the Supreme Court.

In Air and Liquid Systems Corp. v. Devries, the Court considered the case of two women – both widows of Navy soldiers. The widows sued 50+ companies for asbestos exposure on Navy ships, which they believe ultimately led to their husbands’ deaths. The two men developed lung cancer.

These 50+ companies contracted with the Navy. After the equipment was acquired by the Navy, asbestos insulation was applied to it for temperature regulation purposes. The equipment was dependent on the asbestos-containing insulation, but that insulation was applied by a third party.

The question facing the Court was that of liability: Can these 50+ companies be held liable because their products rely on asbestos-containing insulation to safely operate – even though the products themselves did not contain asbestos?

Because the asbestos exposure occurred at sea, this case falls under Maritime Law.

This case brings to mind the “bare metal” defense, a controversial argument designed to protect product manufacturers from liability because they didn’t apply the asbestos, even though it is clear the products they designed and manufactured were dependent on asbestos for their operation.

As the Court continues to carefully weigh the case, we will be keeping an eye on it and similar cases that affect our clients and others affected by asbestos-related diseases.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Legal Claim Cites Ongoing Asbestos Exposure to City Workers

Workers in South Carolina typically expect that the only thing they will have to worry about while at work is just that — work. People should not have to worry that their employers might be concealing important health information from them. Unfortunately, a group of out-of-state workers say they were subjected to that exact problem, and now have to worry about the future effects of asbestos exposure.

Hundreds of city employees were moved into a new building in Jan. 2016. In July 2017, the local Air Pollution Control District received notification that the building owners planned removal of fireproofing materials that contained asbestos. However, it is not clear if anyone else was immediately notified, including the buildings’ tenants.

By Aug. 2017, the city employees who had moved into the building the year before began to complain that they were experiencing adverse health side effects from the construction. Another six months passed before officials were notified that asbestos had accidentally been disturbed during the renovation, exposing workers and necessitating immediate removal. Subsequent testing of samples throughout office spaces returned disturbing results — the asbestos was everywhere.

The city initially announced that it planned to cancel the lease and move its workers elsewhere. However, employees were later told that it was impossible to break the lease without taking a significant financial hit. One city official essentially stated that abating the loss of money was better than protecting the health and well-being of workers, further stating that he believed the asbestos levels were acceptable.

Workers claim that there were other issues after this, including mishandling of asbestos by construction crews. They have since filed a legal claim against the city, and many more employees are expected to join the case. For those who are subjected to asbestos exposure in South Carolina, seeking compensation through the careful actions of a civil suit is often a good idea, as resulting compensation can be applied to related damages, including medical and financial.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Lawsuit Claims Apartment Complex Knew About Asbestos Exposure

South Carolina workers are at particular risk for exposure to the deadly asbestos, especially when clearing away debris from work sites. An out-of-state crew claims that they were knowingly subjected to asbestos exposure when an apartment complex repeatedly denied the existence of the toxic substance. At least two former workers are now suing the complex.

The apartment complex apparently hired the construction crew to remodel multiple units. Workers successfully remodeled five apartments when they found a substance they believed was asbestos. The lawsuit claims that complex’s president allegedly became enraged when approached with their concerns, and ordered them to return to work. Days later, three workers were fired because of concerns they might report the situation to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

A new crew was later hired to transport debris out of the complex. However, the new crew also quickly honed in on the asbestos, and one of the workers removed a sample and had it tested. The results confirmed their suspicions — the debris was full of asbestos. They reported these results to management but within days were instructed to continue removing the debris without any type of training or safety equipment.

Asbestos is a known carcinogen that can cause victims to develop mesothelioma, an incredibly painful and deadly form of cancer. South Carolina employers who intentionally put their workers at risk for asbestos exposure can typically be held responsible through the civil justice system. However, since mesothelioma can take decades after the initial exposure to develop, individuals should keep careful documentation of exposures and medical records.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts