ClickCease

Johnson & Johnson Talc Bankruptcy Petition Dismissal is a Win for Mesothelioma and Ovarian Cancer Victims

mesothelioma attorney Dave Butler

By Dave Butler

In a significant victory for injured consumers, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the bankruptcy petition of a Johnson & Johnson subsidiary that holds the company’s liabilities for claims brought by thousands of consumers injured by exposure to asbestos-contaminated talc in Johnson & Johnson products.  The dismissal, on January 30, 2023, ends for now J&J’s efforts to avoid full responsibility for the claims of those suffering from mesothelioma, ovarian, and other cancers caused by its asbestos-contaminated products.

Through a series of corporate transactions under a unique Texas law, Johnson & Johnson created two new entities with the intention to funnel its liabilities for claims brought by thousands of injured talc claimants into a new entity which it named LTL Management; while simultaneously funneling all of its profitable business into another entity.  Two days after its formation and freshly saddled with J&J’s talc liabilities, LTL Management filed a petition under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code claiming that its talc liabilities placed it in financial distress sufficient to allow it to seek the protections afforded by U.S. bankruptcy laws.

Injured talc victims sought dismissal of the bankruptcy petition, but were denied by a federal court in New Jersey.  Victims appealed that denial to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, which ruled that the J&J subsidiary had not demonstrated that its petition was filed in good faith and should be dismissed.

In its opinion the court found that “At base level, LTL, whose employees are all J&J employees, is essentially a shell company “formed,” almost exclusively, “to manage and defend thousands of talc-related claims” while insulating at least the assets in a non-bankrupt entity.  The court went on to find that “Because LTL was not in financial distress, it cannot show its petition served a valid bankruptcy purpose and was filed in good faith under” the United States Bankruptcy Code.  In conclusion, the court held that:

Our decision dismisses the bankruptcy filing of a company created to file for bankruptcy. It restricts J&J’s ability to move thousands of claims out of trial courts and into bankruptcy court so they may be resolved, in J&J’s words, “equitably” and “efficiently.” But given Chapter 11’s ability to redefine fundamental rights of third parties, only those facing financial distress can call on bankruptcy’s tools to do so. Applied here, while LTL faces substantial future talc liability, its funding backstop plainly mitigates any financial distress foreseen on its petition date.

Read the court’s full opinion here.

RPWB continues to seek justice for victims of exposure to Johnson & Johnson talc products. If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma after exposure to Johnson & Johnson talc products, please call us at u 1-866-594-8765 or fill out the form on this page to begin your case review.

Dave Butler has 30 years of experience representing mesothelioma victims and their families in cases throughout the United States. He can be reached at 1-866-594-8765 or by emailing [email protected].

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Asbestos litigation: Johnson & Johnson faces another lawsuit

South Carolina consumers should feel confident that they are making safe purchases, but this is unfortunately more difficult than it seems. Companies are frequently more concerned with their own bottom lines than they are with the health and safety of their customers. Concerned over citizens’ safety, one state is engaging in asbestos litigation against Valeant Pharmaceuticals and Johnson & Johnson.

The attorney general for this Southwestern state filed a lawsuit against these two companies, citing their alleged knowledge of toxic substances in some of their consumer goods. That suit accuses both of these companies of aggressively marketing their products to minority groups — specifically African-American and Hispanic residents — despite having known for decades that their talc products were contaminated with asbestos. These two groups make up about 50% of the state’s population.

Not only did Johnson & Johnson allegedly misrepresent the safety of its talc-based baby powder and several other products, but it did so despite being fully aware of the implications. In a document that outlined the marketing strategy for that state, the company fully acknowledged that talc negatively impacts communities’ health and is linked to cancer. The attorney general who filed the suit also claims that Johnson & Johnson still misrepresents the toxic nature of its talc products.

Some companies seem to feel as if consumer safety does not matter so long as they are turning profits. This dangerous approach to business jeopardizes the health and well being of everyone in South Carolina. For those who have developed mesothelioma, lung cancer or other diseases because of dangerous products, it is possible to seek compensation through asbestos litigation.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Mesothelioma Cases Expected to Rise Among 9/11 Survivors

Nearly 3,000 people died in the 9/11 attacks, but the death toll steadily increases as survivors succumb to a variety of illnesses. Estimates show as many as 2,100 first responders have died from related diseases as the nation observes the 18th anniversary of the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

Many believe the number of deaths from related diseases will equal or surpass the number who died on the day of the attack by 2020. Nearly 10,000 first responders and others who live and work in the area around the Twin Towers have been diagnosed with cancer, including mesothelioma.

9/11 is expected to have long-lasting health effects

Of the thousands of people diagnosed with health issues resulting from the attacks, the most common illnesses are:

  • Cancers, including mesothelioma
  • Lung and stomach diseases
  • “World Trade Center cough,” a disorder which includes respiratory pain, restricted breathing and coughing up blood and ash
  • Asthma
  • PTSD, depression and other mental health problems

Mesothelioma cases expected to rise

While many of the victims have been diagnosed with melanoma and prostate cancer, malignant mesothelioma cases are only beginning to be reported for people who breathed in asbestos, dust, concrete, glass and other toxic substances near ground zero.

Mesothelioma can take much longer to develop, up to 40 years in some cases and medical professionals expect the number of cases to spike in the next few years along with lung cancer and other diseases.

Seek compensation for asbestos exposure

Nearly 100,000 people have signed up for the World Trade Center Health Program, which helps pay for treatment related to 9/11 illnesses. More than 10% of the funding goes toward cancer treatment, including mesothelioma. If you have been exposed to asbestos, an experienced attorney can help you get the compensation you deserve.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Clinical Trial Explores New Treatment for Mesothelioma

A promising new clinical trial takes a two-drug approach for treating pleural mesothelioma. The cancer occurs in the protective lining of the lung and is caused by inhaling asbestos fibers. It is the most common form of mesothelioma.

The trial combines the well-known immunotherapy drug nivolumab (OPDIVO), and ramucirumab (Cyramza), a drug that stops blood vessels from forming, which can cause new tumor growth. The Food and Drug Administration has already approved both drugs for other cancer treatment.

Clinical trial is expected to run through 2021

The trial is the first time the two drugs have been used together and is a second-line treatment for patients who are not seeing progress after undergoing chemotherapy. Doctors say it’s too soon to determine the treatment’s benefits, but they say results have been positive.

Medical experts say both drugs have successfully treated other forms of cancer, which led researchers to have considerable optimism that they would be effective treating mesothelioma when combined. There is some hope that the treatment may replace chemotherapy as the primary treatment.

Clinical trial will measure two-year survival rates

The study will take place at four sites, and the goal is to accept up to 35 patients. Those participating will receive the combination intravenously every two weeks for two years, providing there are no complications, such as severe side effects or the disease worsening.

The treatment could mark significant progress in battling mesothelioma. Less than one-third of patients diagnosed are eligible for surgery and patients receiving chemotherapy typically survive less than 18 months.

Seek legal assistance if diagnosed with mesothelioma

Asbestos-related diseases are often the result of negligence on the part of employers and other companies who exposed their workers and other citizens to the cancer-causing substance. Those who are diagnosed suffer intense emotional and financial damages. An experienced attorney can help recover damages and hold companies accountable for exposing mesothelioma-sufferers to these harmful fibers.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

What You Should Know About Asbestos Litigation in South Carolina

Maybe you never imagined that you would develop mesothelioma or another type of asbestos-related disease, but that does not change the fact that you did. You understand just how difficult it is to live with one of these diseases. On top of pain and suffering, you may have a diminished quality of life and hefty medical bills you are struggling to pay. If you need help getting compensation for your injuries and are ready to pursue asbestos litigation in South Carolina, here is what you can expect.

Before you file your lawsuit, you need to decide who to name as the defendant or defendants. If you were exposed to asbestos at work, you will probably include your employer. Asbestos exposure can also occur in the home, and if you were renting your landlord or leasing agent could also be responsible. Asbestos manufacturers, installers and companies that irresponsibly used asbestos are also commonly named in these types of lawsuits.

Figuring out who to name in a lawsuit is not as easy as it may seem. Even if you know that you were exposed at work, you will need to prove who was involved with manufacturing or even using the asbestos. This can be a difficult task since patients suffering from mesothelioma were usually exposed to asbestos years or even decades before getting sick.

Uncovering details from the past several decades can be a long, difficult process, so you should consider speaking with an experienced attorney. He or she can not only help you name the correct defendants, but will also help you lay out your case, determine compensation to claim and file a complaint on your behalf. You can learn more about the asbestos litigation process in South Carolina by visiting our website.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Couple Pursues Asbestos Litigation Over Husband’s Injuries

Victims who develop mesothelioma or other related diseases often do so after only being exposed to asbestos from a single source, such as through employment. However, some victims in South Carolina might have developed asbestos-related diseases after multiple sources of exposure. One couple is currently in the middle of asbestos litigation for this type of situation.

The couple, who live in a different state, filed a lawsuit that named multiple defendants, including Johnson & Johnson, Brenntag Specialties Inc., Brenntag North America Inc., 3M Co., and more. The suit claims that these companies were negligent in their use of asbestos. The couple claims that the various companies did not adequately warn people about asbestos exposure or provide warning on product packages. The suit also alleges that the defendants did not properly design or manufacture products that were safe to use.

The husband says that he developed injuries because of ongoing exposure to asbestos through the products that these companies manufactured. One of the places that exposure took place was at his place of work, which was through a local school district. He also claims that he had used talcum powders and Old Spice, which were also sources of exposure. The suit also points to the clothing the man had received from his late father, but did not specify the manner in which the clothing was contaminated with asbestos.

Developing a disease or suffering an injury after being exposed to asbestos is a very difficult experience. Most people end up with large medical bills or related damages that make it difficult to continue living life as normal. Pursuing compensation through asbestos litigation could be helpful for South Carolina victims and their families who are going through this ordeal.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Why Does Asbestos Litigation Seem So Common?

The use of asbestos is heavily regulated, which might lead some people in South Carolina to believe that it is a past problem that has no more bearing on current times. Unfortunately, this is far from reality. As some people develop health problems decades after exposure and companies make headlines for concealing the presence asbestos in their products, asbestos litigation will continue to be an outlet for victims to seek necessary compensation.

Asbestos is incredibly durable. The fibrous substance is even stronger than steel and is also waterproof, fireproof and resistant to corrosion. Even though its use is now limited in the United States, the toxic substance persists in many communities in things like roof shingles, car parts and more. Asbestos’ durable nature makes it difficult to get rid of and perhaps even more difficult to remove safely.

Removing sooner is better than later because, although asbestos is incredibly durable, it can become brittle over time. Brittle asbestos fibers are more easily released into the environment. Scientists have long been aware of the health problems associated with exposure to those types of asbestos fibers. The fatal cancer mesothelioma attacks the lining of the organs and is frequently traced back to asbestos exposure. Asbestosis can lead to scarred lungs and is another disease caused by the toxic fibers.

Since asbestos was once used in a wide range of industries and is still used in selected applications today, virtually anyone could be at risk for asbestos exposure. When that exposure leads to serious and even fatal health outcomes, South Carolina victims may want to consider their options. Asbestos litigation is often effective at recovery necessary compensation, which victims can apply towards their medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, and much more.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

More than 50 people pursue asbestos litigation after demolition

More than four dozen people are suing Johnson Controls Inc. and TOCON Holdings LLC for their alleged role in exposing a group of residents to the toxic substance asbestos. Their claim stems from the demolition of a manufacturing plant. In these types of situations, asbestos litigation is often an effective way for South Carolina victims to recover much-needed compensation for damages, including health bills and more.

The manufacturing plant was no longer in use, and the property owner wanted to tear the building down so that he could sell the property to the area school board. The school board was considering the site for a potential softball field. However, demolition bids from Oct. 2009 showed that to demolish the building properly and safely remove the debris, the owner would have to shell out more money than the property was even worth.

Apparently to avoid the financial costs associated with protecting the community at large from asbestos, the owner instead conspired to tear the building down on its own terms. This included using heavy machinery and skipping out on legally required inspections. This process went on for approximately two years, putting those in the nearby community at risk.

The lawsuit claims that both the owner of the plant as well as its former occupant — Johnson Controls — knew that it contained asbestos, and yet moved forward with the demolition anyway. Now, people living nearby claim that they were wrongfully exposed to asbestos. They will have to live with this concern for years to come, as symptoms of exposure often take time to develop. For South Carolina victims dealing with similar situations, asbestos litigation is often an effective way to hold negligent parties responsible for their exposure, ensuring not only much-needed compensation, but also protection for other people in the future.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Wife Pursues Asbestos Litigation Against Husband’s Ex-Employer

Losing a spouse can be a devastating experience. When the death was caused by the negligence of others, the experience can be even worse. That’s exactly what one woman claims happened to her husband, who developed and ultimately succumbed to lung cancer. She has since brought a lawsuit against his former employer, seeking compensation on her husband’s behalf through asbestos litigation.

The South Carolina woman filed suit both by herself and as the administrator of her late husband’s estate. In it she claims that her husband worked as a welder and laborer for 3M Company during the 1980s. In July 2016, he received a lung cancer diagnosis and died the following month. He was 55 at the time of his death.

The suit alleges that the company and multiple asbestos suppliers are responsible for his illness. His former employer in particular was singled out for intentional injury, while other defendants were listed as responsible parties because they owned the premises at which he worked. This is apparently because the building he worked at during the 1980s was contaminated by asbestos.

Exposure to asbestos can be difficult to document, but keeping careful records as early on in the process as possible is a good idea for anyone who may have been a victim of wrongful exposure. However, even without documentation, victims and their families can still pursue claims. Any resulting compensation from asbestos litigation may be essential for providing end-of-life care or covering funeral expenses, both of which can be incredibly costly for South Carolina families.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Asbestos Litigation Ongoing Regarding Punitive Damages

New headlines still abound with stories regarding a major jury verdict that held Johnson & Johnson liable for more than $100 million in damages for asbestos-related injuries. The manufacturing conglomerate is now battling plaintiffs in a separate state, where are attorneys are arguing for punitive damages on behalf of their clients. The ability to seek punitive damages in asbestos litigation is not something all states allow. South Carolina residents with questions about such issues may seek answers by reaching out for legal support.

In the state where this particular case is being heard in a specialized court, punitive damage petitions were banned in asbestos cases in the late 1990s but were once again allowed as of March 2018. Not everyone is happy about that, and some are appealing the decision in a higher court. Their opinion is that companies that may no longer exist should not be held liable for conduct that occurred many years (perhaps even decades) ago.

A man in New Jersey was able to obtain $80 million in punitive damages because he contracted an incurable cancer known as mesothelioma from using talcum powder in his regular hygiene habits for many years. Attorneys seeking punitive damages in the specialized court are located in New York. Johnson & Johnson has come out fighting, stating punitive damages are reserved as punishment for egregious conduct, which, in their opinion, does not apply to the situation because it can’t be proved that the company knowingly sold products containing asbestos.

To discuss laws pertaining to compensatory or punitive damages in South Carolina asbestos litigation, a potential plaintiff may want to arrange a meeting with an attorney experiences in such matters. Many diseases related to asbestos exposure are incurable. Families impacted by such issues have a right to pursue justice for the suffering they have endured when human negligence caused their situations.

Source: Forbes, “NYC Asbestos Firm Hopes To Continue $117M Hot Streak, Again Seeking Punitives From J&J“, Daniel Fisher, May 8, 2018

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts