ClickCease

Miners & Construction Workers at higher risk for mesothelioma

Asbestos has not disappeared from South Carolina. Whether from old buildings and products or in new uses, asbestos can still be found in many — all over and even in the workplace. Almost anyone could be at risk for exposure, but there are some who face an even greater risk than others. Here are some of the industries in which workers are most likely to develop mesothelioma.

Chrysotile asbestos has not been mined in the United States since 2002. However, many of these mines remained open for many years, with the last one not closing until 2019. Miners who worked in these environments were routinely exposed to small particles of asbestos. This might be at least part of the reason why miners are some of the workers most likely to develop mesothelioma.

South Carolina construction workers are another at-risk population. Asbestos was once a staple in drywall, spackling, shingles, tiles and much more. People who worked with these in the past were exposed during installation, while current workers are most at risk when renovating or demolishing older buildings. Both of these groups can easily develop mesothelioma related to exposure.

Mesothelioma is a devastating, fatal cancer. Treatments may briefly extend patients’ lives, but there is currently no cure. This means that asbestos exposure victims have to make the difficult decision between taking on medical debt to have a little more time with their loved ones, or succumbing to their illness much sooner. Whether exposed at work, home or somewhere else, these victims may want to consider how getting compensation and holding responsible parties accountable for their actions can help.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

South Carolina teachers at risk for developing mesothelioma

Teaching is not necessarily an easy profession, but South Carolina teachers still choose this career path because they are passionate about education. However, while teachers spend years educating young students, many are also suffering from regular asbestos exposure. All that exposure means that elementary and middle school teachers have a much higher risk for developing mesothelioma than other people do.

Teachers have mesothelioma rates similar to those of construction workers, shipbuilders and refinery workers. This was confirmed by a former epidemiologist and chief medical officer at an out-of-state public health division, who performed two separate studies that produce the same results. His most recent study was in 2018, using more recent data than the first.

Schools built before the 1980s are a common source of exposure. Asbestos is fire-resistant and extremely durable, so it was used quite liberally throughout school buildings to protect children in case of fires. As a result, asbestos in schools can be found in many more places than just ceilings and floor tiles. It was common practice to spray asbestos on the ceiling of gymnasiums and auditoriums. Asbestos was also applied directly to walls and used to wrap around heating pipes.

Keeping students and teachers in South Carolina safe involves maintaining safe facilities. Unfortunately, school districts do not always address repairs or regular maintenance in a timely manner, even when they are aware that asbestos is involved. Whether a teacher or student develops mesothelioma after years of exposure in the classroom, it might be possible to recover compensation for things like medical bills and lost wages.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

What is The Average Age of Someone Diagnosed With Mesothelioma?

We recently published a SlideShare titled “What is the average age of someone diagnosed with mesothelioma?

If you wish to speak to an attorney about your options after a mesothelioma diagnosis, please call 866-283-5862.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Asbestos Find Causes Retailers to Pull Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder

Major retailers including Walmart, CVS and Rite Aid have pulled 22-ounce bottles of Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder after the FDA found traces of asbestos in a recently-tested bottle.

The presence of asbestos in Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder prompted Johnson & Johnson to initiate a voluntary recall on approximately 33,000 bottles of the talcum powder.

In recent years, Johnson & Johnson has fought lawsuits filed by people who allege that baby powder use led to their mesothelioma, a very rare cancer that is only caused by asbestos. Talcum powder and asbestos co-exist in the natural geologic formations, and plaintiff’s attorneys allege that asbestos has been present in talcum powder products such as Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder for decades, and that the company has privately fretted about it.

A couple weeks before the announcement that the FDA had found asbestos in Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder, CEO Alex Gorsky said in a taped deposition that the company “unequivocally” believes its talcum powder products do not contain asbestos. Plaintiffs’ attorneys allege that the company engaged in a concerted effort to cover up the presence of asbestos. So far, jury results have been mixed.

Talcum powder products have come under increased scrutiny. In October, a 33-patient case study was published in the Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. It provided support to the contention that exposure to asbestos-tainted talcum powder can cause malignant mesothelioma, the rare and deadly asbestos cancer that affects tissues lining internal organs such as the lungs, intestines, testicles and heart.

The authors of the study profiled the cases of six individuals with mesothelioma, who underwent tissue testing that showed fibers consistent with the type of asbestos found in cosmetic talc, but not in other asbestos products like building supplies and insulation. Some of these people used products containing talcum powder daily for decades.

In addition to the legal battle over whether Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder causes mesothelioma, the company is also fighting lawsuits from women who allege that their use of talcum powder led to ovarian cancer.

RPWB represents talcum powder users nationwide who have developed mesothelioma or ovarian cancer from using Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder and Shower-to-Shower products. Give us a call or submit a message on this page to begin your free, no obligation case review.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Jury Awards $40.3 Million to Mesothelioma Victim

For a variety of reasons, many South Carolina women in past generations used baby powder on a regular basis. In past decades, this was a talc-based product also referred to as talcum powder — and it is dangerous. Talc is often contaminated with other substances, including asbestos. A jury recently awarded a woman $40.3 million after she developed mesothelioma because of asbestos exposure. That exposure was from Johnson & Johnson’s talcum powder.

The woman and her husband brought the lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson. The suit claimed that doctors diagnosed her with mesothelioma back in 2017. Since then she has undergone chemotherapy, radiation, immunotherapy and surgery. Her body tissue was also tested, and experts found both anthophyllite asbestos and tremolite. It has already been shown that both of these substances are contaminants of at least two Johnson & Johnson products, one of those being baby powder.

The lawsuit blamed Johnson & Johnson for the woman’s mesothelioma. The company denied this allegation and instead blamed her cancer diagnosis on where she lived, which is an industrial area. She argued that while she did live in that area, she had never worked at or gone into a facility where exposure to asbestos is possible.

The jury ultimately decided in her favor. The resulting compensation will likely be very helpful for addressing her physical, emotional and financial damages, such as medical bills. The outcome of this case might also give hope to South Carolina patients who are currently battling mesothelioma. While pursuing a claim against a large company for asbestos exposure might seem daunting, it is often possible with the right help.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma? We can help

There are few things in life that can be more terrifying than a cancer diagnosis. If you were exposed to asbestos and are currently in the diagnosis process, you may feel confused and even a little lost. You may have also been surprised to learn that there are four different types of mesothelioma. One of those types is peritoneal mesothelioma.

Asbestos exposure is the number one reason that people develop peritoneal mesothelioma, although it only makes up around from 10 to 20% of all mesothelioma diagnoses. However, most people who are exposed to asbestos while living or working in South Carolina do not even realize that they are sick for many years or even decades. Mesothelioma takes a particularly long time to develop, so most people do not begin experiencing symptoms until it is already too late.

You probably associate mesothelioma with the lungs. Although mesothelioma cancer does frequently form in the lungs, peritoneal mesothelioma shows up in the lining of the abdomen. If detected early on, patients can potentially respond to treatments like surgery, chemotherapy and radiation. Again, mesothelioma is usually not diagnosed until decades have passed, so treatment is not an option for most people. Instead, doctors may only recommend palliative care.

Sadly, there are many companies operating in South Carolina that prioritize their profits over everything else. This means that workers and innocent bystanders were — and still are — wrongly exposed to asbestos. If you were diagnosed with mesothelioma because of an employer’s negligence, you should know that you have options. Be sure to read more about those options right here on our website.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

First New Mesothelioma Treatment in 15 Years Approved By FDA

By Ken Wilson

It’s not often that we get to report new treatments for mesothelioma.

While we do see a lot of clinical trials, the standard treatment plan for malignant pleural mesothelioma has been relatively unchanged for many years. Most patients go through surgery (if they are able to), radiation and chemotherapy.

It can be an aggressive treatment plan. In many instances, doctors diagnose mesothelioma when patients are in the late stages, which means the treatment is challenging because the cancer has spread.

That’s why recent news of the FDA approving the first new treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma in 15 years is so encouraging.

In May 2019, the FDA approved utilizing Tumor Treating Fields for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma in combination with chemotherapy. The approved device is called the NovoTTF-100L System (manufactured by Novocure). It is a non-invasive method that works by delivering electric fields tuned to specific frequencies that disrupt solid tumor cell division. In other words, it hinders mesothelioma tumors from growing and spreading.

The treatment is approved for mesothelioma patients who are not candidates for surgery. Only 10 to 20 percent of patients with pleural mesothelioma are candidates for surgery. The remaining 80 percent of patients typically receive palliative care to improve their quality of life. The use of Tumor Treating Fields is a promising development for those who cannot have surgery to remove the tumors as it may extend their lives and improve treatment outcomes. It was approved under the agency’s Humanitarian Device Exemption pathway, which was created to encourage the innovation of therapies for underserved patients with rare diseases.

The FDA’s approval for the use of Tumor Treating Fields was based on a trial that included 80 pleural mesothelioma patients. Overall, the patients lived an average of 18.1 months, including 21.2 months for patients with epithelioid malignant pleural mesothelioma and 12.1 months for those with non-epithelioid malignant pleural mesothelioma.

That might not seem like a long time, but for late-stage pleural mesothelioma patients who are not candidates for surgery, it can mean more time spent with their loved ones, which is priceless.

As an attorney who has helped mesothelioma patients for over 30 years, the absolute worst part of my practice is seeing people who worked hard for the entire careers have their golden years cut short. Anything that can help extend the amount of time they have with loved ones and diminish their suffering is very positive news and should be celebrated as such.

People who have been diagnosed with mesothelioma and their loved ones should discuss all treatment options with their oncologist in order to make an informed decision that is in the best interest of the mesothelioma patient.

Let’s all hope that we continue to see more new treatments for mesothelioma in the years to come.

Ken Wilson has devoted his career to helping mesothelioma victims. He represents asbestos cancer patients nationwide from his office in Aiken, South Carolina. Wilson is on the Best Lawyers in America list for Product Liability Litigation (Plaintiff). RPWB lawyers were among the first in the country to hold asbestos manufacturers liable for causing mesothelioma. To learn more about our 40-year history helping asbestos victims, please click here. You may contact us at 1-866-594-8765 or use the form on this page to begin a free, no obligation case review.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

US States Sue EPA Over Mesothelioma Concerns

Asbestos is a carcinogen that is extremely hazardous to human health. Exposure to asbestos can cause victims in South Carolina to develop dangerous and even fatal diseases, such as lung cancer, asbestosis and mesothelioma. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recently closed a loophole regarding asbestos use, but some states say the current protections are not enough.

A total of 10 states as well as Washington, D.C. are suing the EPA after critics say the agency failed to protect citizens. The agency passed the new rule in April 2019, which it said closed a decades-old loophole that made it impossible to restrict or prevent sales of certain products containing asbestos. Those suing the EPA said it should have done much more than just closed a single loophole and should have banned the substance altogether.

The lawsuit cites a 2019 petition that called on the EPA to better regulate asbestos, and to also collect more data on how it is imported and used in this country. The EPA denied the petition in the same month that it passed the allegedly lackluster rule. According to the suit, the denial was not only arbitrary, but it was also a violation of the EPA’s obligations according to the Toxic Substances Control Act.

Individuals living in South Carolina and across the rest of the country might be understandably concerned about the continued use of asbestos. Even if the carcinogenic substance was banned from new use, it still exists in an untold number of products that people still use, leaving room for new exposures all the time. When a victim develops mesothelioma or other illness as a result of that exposure, it can be helpful to explore what type of compensation might be needed or possible to recover from any negligent parties.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

FDA Approves New Treatment for Mesothelioma

We recently published a slideshare which provides information about a new FDA-approved therapy for sufferers of mesothelioma.

Please view the information below, and call our law firm if you have any questions about your legal options following a mesothelioma diagnosis.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Victim’s Family Continues Mesothelioma Suit Against Ford

South Carolina residents should be able to go to work without fear for their health, well-being and general safety. Additionally, older workers should have the luxury of looking back over their working careers without realizing that they were wrongfully exposed to deadly substances. This is unfortunately not the reality that many people face, and mesothelioma patients in particular might feel especially frustrated by their work situations. Seeking compensation is usually a good way to address those frustrations, but doing so might not always be easy.

A year before his death from peritoneal mesothelioma, a former generator service technician and mechanic sued the Ford Motor Co. He claimed that his mesothelioma was caused by ongoing asbestos exposure while working for Ford. Although he passed away from his illness before the suit was completed, his surviving family members were named as plaintiffs.

Ford later filed a motion for the wrongful death suit to be dismissed entirely, but a court only partly granted that motion. According to Ford and the court, aspects of the case overlapped with areas covered by that state’s workers’ compensation act, so any claims in regard to employer liability were barred. However, the plaintiffs can move forward with the suit on other grounds and may even decide to bring forth additional allegations not related to employment.

Suffering from an asbestos-related disease like mesothelioma can be truly traumatizing. Victims in South Carolina often suffer intense physical, emotional and financial damages that cannot be adequately addressed without help. Securing compensation through carefully pursued lawsuits can be difficult at times, but is usually an effective approach for handling these types of damages.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts