ClickCease

Auto workers frequent victims of asbestos exposure

Few people in South Carolina may be able to imagine a life without motor vehicles. People use their cars for commuting to work, traveling for entertainment and much, much more. Although for some people driving and riding in vehicles is just another fixture of daily life, those who work and perform routine maintenance on those cars could be deadly. An investigation revealed that workers in the auto industry are frequent victims of asbestos exposure.

An out-of-state newspaper recently assessed safety information at various repair shops in different major metropolitan areas. The results were disheartening, as 75% of businesses that regularly perform brake and clutch repairs have high levels of asbestos fibers in the air. One study showed that people who work on brakes compared to other vehicle components have much higher concentrations of asbestos fibers in their lungs. Asbestos fibers do not break down and stay in the lungs forever.

The same investigation also documented that the dust found in all garages and repair shops were comprised of asbestos levels ranging from 2.26% to 63.8%. In most work spaces, cleaning can actually make the problem worse. These asbestos levels are perhaps just one of the many reasons why one out of every 10 auto workers is at a high risk for developing an asbestos-related disease, illness or cancer.

South Carolina auto workers may not realize that they are at risk for developing an asbestos-related disease. No matter which industry an individual works in or whether he or she was aware of the risk for asbestos exposure, developing a deadly disease can be physically, emotionally and financially traumatizing. In order to ease the burden these damages cause, a victim might consider taking action that, if successful, can achieve necessary compensation for documented monetary damages.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Asbestos Exposure Caused By Both Old and New Usage

The use of asbestos in new products might be limited, but that does not protect people from either current or past usage. Older buildings — or at least those that were built several decades ago — are a common source of asbestos exposure, including places like post offices, churches, hospitals, barbershops and movie theaters. Since it is extremely durable, asbestos was once commonly used in construction as an insulator. However, that durability as well as continued use is putting today’s South Carolina residents at risk.

Although people generally think of asbestos as a problem of the past, it is still a relatively recent problem. Not only was asbestos used for a significant portion of the 1900s, but usage of this toxic substance hit its peak in the 1970s. Most uses of asbestos were briefly banned by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in 1989, but two years later it was overturned. Today there are only partial bans and some restrictions. Automobile parts, fertilizer and piping are just a few of the products that are still being manufactured with asbestos.

According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, an estimated one million workers are exposed to asbestos while at work. However, people do not have to be employed in the manufacturing or construction industries to be at risk for exposure. As buildings get older, their pipes, walls, ceilings and floors naturally deteriorate, exposing decades-old asbestos. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, it is extremely likely that that vast majority of charter, primary and secondary schools have asbestos in things like ceiling and floor tiles, decorative insulation and materials used to soundproof music rooms.

Asbestos does not discriminate, and both adults and children can inadvertently be exposed to this substance. That asbestos exposure often leads to serious and even fatal health consequences, including the deadly cancer mesothelioma. For cancer patients in South Carolina who are fighting this terrible disease, getting just compensation for physical, emotional and financial damages can be extremely beneficial to both themselves as well as their families.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Johnson & Johnson Under Investigation For Asbestos Exposure

In past decades, parents in South Carolina probably did not give a second thought to using baby powder on their children or even themselves. What these consumers might not have realized at the time was that they were purchasing a potentially dangerous product. However, Johnson & Johnson — a large manufacturer of talcum baby powder — may have known. The company is now the subject of a criminal probe as investigators try to determine what it knew about the risk of asbestos exposure.

More than 14,000 victims are suing Johnson & Johnson, claiming that the talc used in many of its products led to cancer diagnoses. Now, the U.S. Department of Justice is trying to determine whether the company knew about the cancer risks associated with its products, and if it lied about that knowledge. In Feb. 2019, Johnson & Johnson disclosed that both the Securities and Exchange Commission and the DOJ had issued subpoenas for information regarding ongoing litigation over its baby powder products.

In Dec. 2018, a report from Reuters indicated that Johnson & Johnson may have known about the cancer-causing substance in its products. According to that report, repeated testing showed that asbestos had been found in powder and talc products between the 1970s and 2000s. Apparently, Johnson & Johnson never shared this information with regulators or consumers.

South Carolina consumers cannot make informed decisions about purchases unless they have access to information about possible risks. It is possible that many people would have purchased alternative products had they been informed of the potential risks. While it may be too late to undo the effects of asbestos exposure, a victim may be able to seek compensation for any illness that he or she developed as a result.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Military Families Worried about Asbestos Exposure

Living the military life is not easy. Between deployments and frequent moves, active military members and their families have enough on their plates to worry about. The possibility of dealing with asbestos exposure in their own homes probably seemed far-fetched, but it is now the reality that many are facing. The contractor accused of exposing military families to asbestos operates in multiple states, including South Carolina.

Balfour Beatty is one of the largest housing contractors for the military, and its records show that the company does a pretty good job in that regard. However, a joint investigation by CBS News and Reuters uncovered some horrifying news — Balfour Beatty was falsifying its data from at least one of its base locations in an effort to secure larger bonuses. According to an FBI investigation, the company prioritized making it appear as though problems were addressed quickly rather than actually fixing housing issues, such as dangerous asbestos flooring.

One family said they were living in a home that was not only in poor condition, but that also had asbestos-filled tiles. A technician who responded to a maintenance call for a leak at the home reported to superiors that the family’s infant could become sick after chewing on the damaged floor tiles. However, the child’s parents were never given that information. Additionally, the records regarding that maintenance call were also falsified and showed that a technician was sent out and the leak fixed within 20 minutes of the call. The actual repairs apparently took much longer.

Prioritizing profits and bonuses over the health of tenants is a disturbing act that can have lifelong implications for victims. Asbestos exposure is extremely harmful to humans, and anyone from infants to the elderly can end up developing serious medical issues as a result. Cancers such as mesothelioma and lung cancer are common, and the resulting medical bills and related lost wages can be financially devastating. Victims living in South Carolina may choose to address those financial damages as well as physical and emotional pain and suffering through civil suits, which can hold negligent parties responsible for their actions.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Women Who Wear Makeup Could Be Victims of Asbestos Exposure

Applying makeup is a daily practice for many women in South Carolina. These women should be able to put on their makeup without worrying about asbestos exposure, but this might not be the case. A significant number of cosmetics could contain this cancer-causing substance, putting women everywhere at risk for serious and even fatal health problems.

According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, cosmetic manufacturers who market their products in America are not legally required to perform safety tests on their products. One state introduced a bill that would effectively ban the sale of any cosmetics that contain anything from a list of 15 toxic minerals and chemicals. Asbestos was included on that list, as were mercury and formaldehyde. There was significant opposition to the bill, especially by those who thought it would affect job prospects in the state, and it ultimately did not pass.

The possible presence of asbestos in makeup is extremely distressing. The Centers for Disease Control acknowledges that there are no safe levels of asbestos exposure. Any type of exposure can potentially lead to cancer.

As it currently stands, women who wear makeup might have no way of telling whether their products are contaminated with asbestos. However, going without makeup is not an option for many of these women. Even if it were, those who have been applying makeup for years could have already experienced asbestos exposure. While this can be understandably frightening, women and other people in South Carolina who have been exposed to asbestos should be sure to pay close attention to their health. They should record any troubling symptoms and seek medical care when necessary.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

City blamed for firefighter trainees’ asbestos exposure

As public servants, firefighters put themselves in harm’s way in order to protect the people of South Carolina. Firefighters likely expect to encounter potentially dangerous substances while on the job. However, few may think that they would be victims of asbestos exposure during their training.

An out-of-state city might have to shell out for fines associated with asbestos at its area fire academy training center. According to the area Air Pollution Control District — the APCD — the training academy is quite old and contains a number of materials contaminated with asbestos. This includes things like floor tile and mastic, a type of adhesive used in construction. The APCD claims that firefighters in training between 2001 and July 2018 were exposed to asbestos at the facility.

The fire chief does not necessarily deny that the some of his trainees were exposed to asbestos. He does dispute the date of 2001 as cited by the APCD, since he says they never fully identified when the asbestos debris was deposited. He also stated that the facility is regularly inspected. Anytime that asbestos contamination is found, it is apparently cleaned up in a timely manner.

It is unclear if that is truly the case or not. Legal documents allege that the city tried to downplay the health risks and danger associated with asbestos. It also did not act quickly when it came to protecting both its trainees as well as its veteran firefighters from exposure. According to the APCD, the presence of asbestos in the building can be confirmed to as far back as May 2000.

South Carolina workers expect their employers to provide safe working spaces. When they fail to do so, workers can end up being exposed to asbestos exposure and not realizing it until they are diagnosed with a fatal disease. In such cases, it may be important for victims to act quickly in order to recover just and necessary compensation for their medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering and more.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Apartment Residents Worried About Asbestos Exposure

Removing asbestos from older buildings is extremely dangerous. If not done properly, asbestos fibers can become airborne. This type of asbestos exposure is linked to devastating health outcomes, including lung cancer and mesothelioma. However, before being diagnosed, some people in South Carolina might not even know that they were ever exposed to the deadly substance.

A group of residents at an apartment in another state say they were never warned of possible exposure to asbestos. The asbestos was located in the apartment’s laundry room, which is located in the basement of the building. Residents say they were never notified that work would be going on before the removal process started.

One of the residents only found out that the removal project was for asbestos because she works from home and was there when it started. When the workers left, they put up a sign warning residents to stay out of the basement for at least 24 hours. According to that same woman the basement doors were wide open the next morning. The property manager later sent an email saying that the residents were not at risk because he did not believe that the asbestos ever became airborne.

Asbestos is a cancer-causing substance found in a wide variety of products. Many older buildings are contaminated with the substance, which can become deadly if disturbed. When South Carolina building owners do not adequately warn residents or visitors of possible asbestos exposure or take the correct steps for its removal, they can potentially be held responsible for their actions. Many victims find that pursuing civil suits against these individuals can achieve both necessary compensation as well as a much-needed sense of justice.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Whole Community Still Fears Asbestos Exposure

Working in certain industries can put people at a higher than average risk for being exposed to asbestos. However, being employed in construction or manufacturing is far from the only way to fall victim to asbestos exposure. In some situations, entire neighborhoods and communities might be exposed through no fault of their own.

The residents of a community in a state outside of South Carolina say they are still scared about the lingering effects of asbestos in their neighborhoods. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, asbestos was discovered in the neighborhood back in 2011. The asbestos came from a nearby vermiculite processing plant, which operated between the years of 1953 and 1989. One long-time resident said that there were plenty of unexplainable deaths throughout the decades.

A three-phase cleanup project included soil excavation and taking multiple air and ground samples, and was wrapped up back in Dec. 2016. The full cleanup was being finalized in Jan. 2017. However, residents believe that this might not have been enough. The nearby plant that processed the asbestos-contaminated vermiculite is still standing. Although no longer in operation, there is plenty of concern that it could continue spreading asbestos.

When entire communities are affected by asbestos exposure, the impact can be widespread and devastating. South Carolina families may be unsure of where to turn for help or how to approach the financial aspect of handling the medical expenses of loved ones fighting such a dreaded disease. In some situations, victims and their families choose to pursue civil lawsuits against the parties who caused the exposure, in pursuit of monetary damages incurred as a result of negligent exposure to asbestos.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

EPA Seeks to Limit Asbestos Exposure With New Rule

Despite the fact that the dangerous health effects of asbestos are well understood, it is still imported into the United States. This imported substance is used in a wide range of products that continue to put people in South Carolina at significant risk for asbestos exposure. A new rule from the Environmental Protection Agency could help reduce the risk of exposure to new uses of asbestos.

While many people believe that the United States has a total ban on asbestos, it actually only has a partial ban. That partial ban has allowed the ongoing importation and manufacturing of asbestos, which is frequently used during industrial processes and in specialized products. The EPA proposed its Significant New Use Rule — SNUR — in 2018, which it hoped would close up loopholes that allow ongoing asbestos use. Feedback from safety advocates led the EPA to revise SNUR.

In its current iteration, SNUR will prevent any asbestos use aside from those that are already taking place. It will also make it easier for the EPA to regulate asbestos and any applications for exceptions. Those that request exceptions will also be subjected to an intense safety review as well as additional regulations and restrictions.

New rules and legislation aimed at reducing the risk of asbestos exposure are important, particularly when it comes to the health and well-being of South Carolina residents. Whether from older or newer uses, exposure to asbestos can lead to some devastating diseases. Mesothelioma and lung cancer can be fatal to victims, who often need help getting compensation for their medical bills, lost wages and other damages.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Property Owners Sentenced For Asbestos Exposure

Removing asbestos can be a dangerous undertaking and may put workers and nearby people at risk for exposure. In order to minimize asbestos exposure and the related health risks, removal of the toxic substance is heavily regulated. Some people in South Carolina and elsewhere view this regulation as more of an annoying roadblock than an important safety measure, and end up making decisions that land them in trouble with the law.

In 2015, a pair of brothers purchased a property that they knew contained asbestos. Reportedly 35 and 39 years of age, they were told by their realtor that it would be costly to have the asbestos properly removed. Another potential buyer had apparently backed out of the purchase when he received a $117,000 bid to safely remove the asbestos in the right manner. The brothers moved ahead with the purchase.

According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office, the brothers hired a crew to demolish areas of their building that were contaminated with significant levels of asbestos. Not only did workers not use proper methods for safe removal such as negative air pressure and protective sheeting, but they were also not equipped with the right safety gear. The workers were given masks and suits to wear, but neither were approved for asbestos protection, which left them vulnerable to exposure.

The property owners were recently sentenced for the illegal removal of asbestos. Both will serve a year for probation, perform 50 hours for community service and pay a $9,500 fine. However, no amount of criminal consequences can undo the asbestos exposure that workers and other people likely suffered. This is why it can be so important for victims of exposure in South Carolina to hold negligent individuals responsible for their actions. Not only can successful claims achieve compensation for things like mesothelioma and lung cancer, but they can also force companies to be more responsible when dealing with toxic substances like asbestos.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts