ClickCease

Johnson & Johnson Allegedly Knew About Asbestos Exposure

Asbestos, a toxic, cancer-causing substance, is well-known to be dangerous to human health. This is not new information to anyone in South Carolina, and yet for decades Johnson & Johnson allegedly knew that their products were contaminated with asbestos, and said nothing. Evidence indicates that the company actively tried to cover up ongoing asbestos exposure suffered by their customers.

Johnson & Johnson uses talc in its popular baby powder product, which many women use on not only their children, but also themselves. Talc has not been totally proven to be safe, but it is often contaminated with asbestos. This is because asbestos is frequently found wherever talc is mined, making contamination a frightening reality. According to one report, completely purifying talc is impossible.

Various global health organizations recognize that asbestos is a carcinogen that causes ovarian cancer and mesothelioma. That did not stop Johnson & Johnson from misleading the Federal Drug Administration back in the 1970s, when it hid testing results that showed asbestos had been found in its baby powder. The company spent decades insisting that even when asbestos was present in its products that they were still totally safe for consumers to use.

The women who have since filed lawsuits against the company say otherwise. Women who used Johnson & Johnson’s baby powder for years or even decades before developing ovarian cancer are trying to hold the company responsible for its actions that put them and countless others at risk for serious health issues. However, the company still claims it did nothing wrong, and at this point it is unclear if it will continue to manufacture its iconic and possibly dangerous iconic product.

Consumers have a right to purchase products that are free from hidden dangers. When companies like Johnson & Johnson actively hide knowledge regarding possible asbestos exposure, it is South Carolina consumers who suffer. While the damage may have already been done, victims can pursue legal compensation for their injuries which, if successful, can also help influence change that protects future consumers.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Library Demolition May Cause Widespread Asbestos Exposure

Despite its once prevalent use in construction, most people in South Carolina now understand just how dangerous asbestos is. As such, communities have an understandable right to be concerned when they learn of a potential source of asbestos exposure or contamination. For one community in a different state, there are mounting worries in regard to the demolition of an old library.

Demolition began on the closed library on Dec. 3, 2018, although it was starkly opposed by members of the community. The building contained asbestos in several different areas, including in the floors, roof and fireproofing materials. The original plan was to have a crew carefully remove the asbestos before demolition, but it ended up being condemned back in September, and officials determined it would not be safe for workers to remove the asbestos.

Demolition plans switched to a controlled abatement, which alarmed many people in the community. This process involves continuously spraying the work site with water to prevent any airborne asbestos contamination. However, this leads to contaminated water that workers must contain and filter; otherwise they risk contaminating nearby soil or groundwater.

Unfortunately, even when South Carolina communities raise serious and valid concerns, their opinions are often disregarded. When dangerous demolitions result in asbestos exposure, it is those nearby communities that often suffer the hardest hits. It is important for potential victims to keep rigorous notes and records of any ill health effects they experience after an exposure. Doing so may come in handy if they develop any of the number of related diseases years down the road.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Man Started illegal Fire, Community Suffered Asbestos Exposure

Asbestos is a highly toxic substance, which is why rules and regulations regarding its proper disposal are so incredibly important. Unfortunately, many South Carolina businessmen and women prefer to prioritize their own bottom lines over having to pay for the right methods of disposal. In a recent out-of-state incident, a man allegedly caused an entire community to suffer from asbestos exposure because of his actions.

Back in Feb. 2017, the business owner created an enormous mound full of brush waste and mobile homes. Reports indicate that the trash mound was approximately 20 feet tall, and contained at least five old mobile homes. The area’s fire chief had apparently already warned the man not to burn the old homes, who even asked the city for permission to do so but was ultimately denied.

Despite this, he set the pile of trash on fire at 3 a.m., perhaps expecting that it would burn off before the dawn. Unfortunately, the fire raged on for over a week. Inspectors from that state’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration witnessed the mound continuing to smolder through the end of March 2017. Samples of the debris were later collected and tested positive for asbestos. The businessman could now face of more than $100,000 in fines for the fire.

There is no safe level of asbestos exposure in humans, and the substance is known to cause cancer and other serious health issues. When the negligence of a person or business leads to unnecessary exposure, South Carolina victims can seek compensation for financial, emotional and medical damages through a civil lawsuit. However, since health problems can take years to develop, victims may want to keep careful records of medical tests and treatments as soon as they are made aware of the exposure.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Fines Issued for Asbestos Exposure at Hotel Renovation

Renovations are often billed as exciting changes for the future, but in some cases they can be deadly. Because of the once widespread use of asbestos in South Carolina and across the rest of the nation, exposure during renovations are sadly not uncommon. Indeed, three companies were recently fined for asbestos exposure that occurred during renovations of an out-of-state hotel.

Renovations were apparently well under way on the 107-year-old building when inspectors discovered something troubling. Air quality indicated that asbestos material had been improperly handled and disposed of, potentially exposing many people to the toxic substance. The findings were so troubling that the state’s labor agency immediately shut down construction so that investigators could look into the matter. The investigation lasted about three months, during which time renovations were at a standstill.

Based on the findings from that investigation, three companies were slapped with fines totaling approximately $140,000. Fines were levied for issues like general and serious violations of worker safety and a over a dozen violations of regulations regarding the handling of hazardous materials. Renovations have since resumed, with the owner of the hotel predicting that it will be open sometime during the spring of 2019.

Unfortunately, many companies prioritize time and profits over the safety of workers and the general public. When asbestos exposure threatens the well-being of South Carolina residents, the resulting aftermath can be more than just costly — it can be deadly. Compensation from successfully pursued civil can help asbestos victims address the costs of mesothelioma, lung cancer and other related health problems.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Is Asbestos Exposure A Thing of The Past?

Construction workers, those in the manufacturing industry and many others in South Carolina, frequently work with strange-sounding chemicals and substances but never develop cancer. So what makes asbestos exposure so different in this regard? Asbestos is well-understood to be a durable material that is extremely dangerous to human health.

Asbestos is not only durable, but is also extremely resistant to heat and a good insulator. Because of this, it was once widely used in an untold number of products, including brake pads, construction materials and much, much more. Unfortunately, that durable nature also makes it extremely hazardous.

When inhaled, asbestos dust can settle in the lungs, contributing to a number of serious illnesses. Mesothelioma — a fatal cancer — is perhaps most well-known, but it is certainly not the only danger. Asbestosis is a condition in which the dust causes permanent fibrous scarring in a person’s lungs. These disease most frequently occur in individuals who suffer long-term exposure.

Despite attempts dating back in 1989 to heavily restrict new uses of asbestos, it is still commonly used with fewer restrictions than people might expect. This means that there may be many people in South Carolina who are at risk for asbestos exposure without realizing it. Individuals who suspect that they may have been exposed to this toxic substance should consider keeping careful and detailed records as early on as possible. By documenting known or suspected exposures, health issues and more, victims may be more prepared to pursue necessary compensation in the future.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Parents Understandably Concerned About Asbestos Exposure and Mold

Like most good parents in other states, South Carolina parents of elementary-age school children expect school administrators and faculty to do all they can to keep their children safe when classes are in session during the school year. Many parents of students in one particular school in another state say they are unsure whether that is being done. In fact, they are quite concerned about asbestos exposure and mold issues that remain ongoing at their children’s school and have been for some time.

The situation began to unfold back in February when the school’s roof sprung a leak. Such needed repairs should come as no surprise in a building that was constructed in 1955. The leak, however, was not the only problem. When the roof was being inspected, asbestos and mold were found.

The school was shut down the following month to address the issues. Parents were reportedly told the rest of the problem would be taken care of over the summer. However, it is now October 2018 and the problems are apparently still occurring. One parent, who wished to remain anonymous, stated that even the janitors’ union kept workers from their duties at the school, saying current conditions are simply far too unsafe.

Both mold and asbestos exposure are associated with many serious health problems. School officials told parents that classes are going to resume, and doors will be kept open and dehumidifiers running to create clean air space; many parents say those solutions are not enough to keep their children safe. Any South Carolina parent worried about similar issues at his or her child’s school may wish to discuss the matter with an experienced personal injury attorney, preferably one that has asbestos litigation experience.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Where is asbestos exposure most likely to occur?

Mesothelioma is a deadly cancer caused by exposure to the toxic substance asbestos. Every year in the United States, an average of 3,000 people receive a mesothelioma diagnosis. Annual deaths from mesothelioma total about 2,500. Although preventing asbestos exposure from a negligent party can be difficult, people in South Carolina can be more aware of common exposure sites.

Most people think of the military as protectors, but they are putting active duty members and those living near Air Force bases at serious risk for health complications. Asbestos was a common building component for buildings across most air bases and is commonly used in war vehicles and aircrafts. Those living around military bases might not realize that they are potentially exposed to airborne asbestos just by their proximity.

Industrial and commercial sites also pose a common danger. Anything from chemical plants to brewing companies may be harboring hidden asbestos, which is a frequent component of construction for both buildings and heavy equipment. Even if no new asbestos has been introduced, proper asbestos abatement and disposal should be carried out to protect workers.

What about people who do not live near military bases or work in industrial complexes? While these individuals might feel safe, asbestos may be lurking anywhere, including in homes, schools and office work spaces. Older auto parts — such as clutches or brakes — often contain asbestos as well.

The sad reality for many people in South Carolina is that hidden asbestos may be hiding virtually anywhere. In some cases, employers, business owners and manufacturers are even aware of the issue, but do not take necessary steps to warn potential victims or provide necessary safety information. In such cases, these entities can be held responsible for asbestos exposure and resulting health effects through the careful actions of a civil suit.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Legal Claim Cites Ongoing Asbestos Exposure to City Workers

Workers in South Carolina typically expect that the only thing they will have to worry about while at work is just that — work. People should not have to worry that their employers might be concealing important health information from them. Unfortunately, a group of out-of-state workers say they were subjected to that exact problem, and now have to worry about the future effects of asbestos exposure.

Hundreds of city employees were moved into a new building in Jan. 2016. In July 2017, the local Air Pollution Control District received notification that the building owners planned removal of fireproofing materials that contained asbestos. However, it is not clear if anyone else was immediately notified, including the buildings’ tenants.

By Aug. 2017, the city employees who had moved into the building the year before began to complain that they were experiencing adverse health side effects from the construction. Another six months passed before officials were notified that asbestos had accidentally been disturbed during the renovation, exposing workers and necessitating immediate removal. Subsequent testing of samples throughout office spaces returned disturbing results — the asbestos was everywhere.

The city initially announced that it planned to cancel the lease and move its workers elsewhere. However, employees were later told that it was impossible to break the lease without taking a significant financial hit. One city official essentially stated that abating the loss of money was better than protecting the health and well-being of workers, further stating that he believed the asbestos levels were acceptable.

Workers claim that there were other issues after this, including mishandling of asbestos by construction crews. They have since filed a legal claim against the city, and many more employees are expected to join the case. For those who are subjected to asbestos exposure in South Carolina, seeking compensation through the careful actions of a civil suit is often a good idea, as resulting compensation can be applied to related damages, including medical and financial.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Lawsuit Claims Apartment Complex Knew About Asbestos Exposure

South Carolina workers are at particular risk for exposure to the deadly asbestos, especially when clearing away debris from work sites. An out-of-state crew claims that they were knowingly subjected to asbestos exposure when an apartment complex repeatedly denied the existence of the toxic substance. At least two former workers are now suing the complex.

The apartment complex apparently hired the construction crew to remodel multiple units. Workers successfully remodeled five apartments when they found a substance they believed was asbestos. The lawsuit claims that complex’s president allegedly became enraged when approached with their concerns, and ordered them to return to work. Days later, three workers were fired because of concerns they might report the situation to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

A new crew was later hired to transport debris out of the complex. However, the new crew also quickly honed in on the asbestos, and one of the workers removed a sample and had it tested. The results confirmed their suspicions — the debris was full of asbestos. They reported these results to management but within days were instructed to continue removing the debris without any type of training or safety equipment.

Asbestos is a known carcinogen that can cause victims to develop mesothelioma, an incredibly painful and deadly form of cancer. South Carolina employers who intentionally put their workers at risk for asbestos exposure can typically be held responsible through the civil justice system. However, since mesothelioma can take decades after the initial exposure to develop, individuals should keep careful documentation of exposures and medical records.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Welder Blames Former Employer for Asbestos Exposure

Working with or around asbestos is dangerous, and South Carolina employers should always be certain that they provide workers with the proper safety gear, training and knowledge to do so safely. Sadly, many workplaces conceal this type of important information, leaving workers in the dark about their situation. Many are not even aware that they experienced asbestos exposure until they develop the deadly health effects.

An out of-state-man is suing his former employer, blaming the company for his current sickness. Starting in 1965, he spent 40 years working for the company Irby’s Steel. He left the company in 2005, and in 2016 received his diagnosis — lung cancer. And not just any lung cancer, but one that is linked to asbestos exposure.

According to his lawsuit, he was routinely exposed to asbestos fibers in the air while carrying out his work duties. Irby’s Steel allegedly knew that many of the products used by its workers contained asbestos, but failed to act responsibly. The welder says he never received adequate warning about the asbestos and was never given instructions on how to protect himself from asbestos fibers.

When workers in South Carolina develop mesothelioma, lung cancer or other serious medical conditions because of their employer’s negligence, they can take action. A successful suit might not undo the damage caused by asbestos exposure, but it can provide necessary financial compensation for related medical bills, lost wages and any pain and suffering. These types of claims can also be effective at forcing companies to enact better safety precautions, which protect future workers.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts