ClickCease

Do You Know the Most Common Form of Mesothelioma?

You may have already known that asbestos is toxic and tried to avoid it, or maybe you had never even heard of the substance before receiving a life-altering diagnosis. The fatal cancer mesothelioma is unfortunately not an uncommon outcome of asbestos exposure. Mesothelioma can present in several different forms, but pleural mesothelioma is the most common in South Carolina.

Despite being the most common type of mesothelioma, pleural mesothelioma often goes undiagnosed for significant periods of time. This is due to a number of factors, including the sometimes lengthy delay between exposure and the onset of the disease. Once victims start to develop symptoms they are often misdiagnosed because of how similar pleural mesothelioma symptoms are to that of other diseases.

There are not many treatment options available to victims of pleural mesothelioma. Despite being the most common type of this cancer, treatment is often fickle. When diagnosed early enough, treatments like chemotherapy, radiation and even surgery can be helpful in extending patients’ lifespans. For those who received their diagnoses too late, palliative care is usually the only option.

There is no way to undo the harm caused by careless manufacturers, employers and industrial companies. This does not mean that you do not deserve justice for your mesothelioma diagnosis. In South Carolina, it is possible to seek compensation through a civil lawsuit, which can lead to compensation for medical bills, pain and suffering, economic damages and much more. If you need more information about pleural mesothelioma or other diseases related to asbestos, our website has a wide range of resources.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Supreme Court Ruling Will Help Asbestos Victims

By Dave Butler

The United States Supreme Court delivered an unexpectedly good opinion for asbestos victims last week.

For years, equipment makers (including those who make pumps, valves, turbines and boilers) have argued that they only make and sell metal products and cannot be held responsible for asbestos products made by third parties and later applied to their equipment (e.g. gaskets, insulation, etc.). This argument is known as the bare metal defense. As an asbestos attorney, this argument is particularly maddening because these companies know that the equipment they manufactured required asbestos to operate properly.

However, in Air & Liquid Systems Corp. et al v. Devries, the Supreme Court ruled that in a maritime tort context, a product manufacturer has a duty to warn when:

  • its product requires the incorporation of a part,
  • the manufacturer knows or has reason to know that the integrated product is likely to be dangerous for its intended uses, and
  • the manufacturer has no reason to believe that the product’s users will realize that danger.

The opinion – written by Justice Brett Kavanaugh along with Justices Roberts, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor and Kagan – will particularly help Navy veterans and others who developed mesothelioma as a result of asbestos exposure at sea. We also suspect the opinion may carry some weight on dry land as well.

To read the full opinion click here.

Dave Butler, who has worked as an asbestos attorney since 1993, helps people diagnosed with mesothelioma throughout the United States. For more information about our asbestos and mesothelioma work, please click here or fill out the contact form on this page.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Compensation For Mesothelioma Is Possible

Asbestos was once frequently used in a wide range of industries, from automobiles to manufacturing to construction and much more. For those working in these types of industries, exposure to asbestos was not only common but, at one point in time, even routine. Decades later, many of these workers are now suffering the serious health consequences of that exposure. The fatal cancer mesothelioma is just one such illness that impacts victims in South Carolina.

Mesothelioma most commonly shows up in victims’ lungs, although it is also possible to develop mesothelioma in the abdomen, heart lining and testicles. Pleural mesothelioma — the kind that shows up in the lungs — is responsible for 75 percent of all mesothelioma diagnoses. Victims with this type of cancer generally report having trouble breathing. Fluid can also build up in the lungs, which it difficult and painful to breath.

Since the primary symptoms of mesothelioma — trouble breathing and coughing — can also be indications of other diseases, those who are experiencing such symptoms should consult with their doctor. Young adults who have not been exposed to asbestos likely do not have to worry about discovering that they have mesothelioma. Those at the highest risk are generally older adults who were employed in occupations that involved asbestos. In some cases, mesothelioma and its symptoms can take as long as 50 years to develop.

Being diagnosed with mesothelioma is a traumatizing experience. After diagnosis, most South Carolina patients are not given much time to live. Civil suits pursued against those responsible for asbestos exposure — including employers and manufacturers — can help victims achieve necessary compensation for things like medical expenses, loss of income, physical pain and suffering and much more. Need more information about mesothelioma and your options for legal recourse? Be sure to visit our website.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Mesothelioma Victim, Wife File Suit for Asbestos Exposure

South Carolina patients who develop serious, life-threatening medical issues suffer more than just physical symptoms. Many deal with ongoing and severe emotional distress related to their illnesses. This is often true for patients dealing with mesothelioma, a fatal cancer caused by exposure to asbestos. Some victims decide to channel their emotional distress toward holding those responsible for their asbestos exposure accountable.

An elderly wife and her husband with mesothelioma filed a suit against more than a dozen defendants. According to the claim, the husband began working during the 1950s. During his decades of work, he says that he was routinely and repeatedly exposed to asbestos fibers, which he inhaled and ingested. The defendants — including Ameron International — allegedly sold, distributed, manufactured or installed the asbestos-tainted products. He also asserts that he was never warned of the dangers of asbestos or given any guidance on its safe handling.

The victim points out that all he had done was pursue a normal course of employment when, through no fault of his own, he was exposed to large amounts of asbestos. He and his wife claim that his resulting mesothelioma diagnosis caused him to suffer both physical pain and mental anguish. As a result, the suit also claims that the wife has lost the companionship of her husband.

Asbestos is an extremely unsafe substance that can lead to devastating outcomes. Although money can never undo the harm caused by negligent asbestos exposure, compensation can go a long way for South Carolina victims with mesothelioma. Any resulting legal recourse might be applied to medical bills, lost wages, physical and emotional trauma and more.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

I Was Diagnosed With Mesothelioma, What Can I Do?

Regardless of how many fruits and vegetables South Carolina residents eat, how often they exercise and how well they take care of themselves, another person’s negligence can still cause them to develop serious health issues. Developing mesothelioma as a result of asbestos exposure is just one devastating example of this. This form of cancer is usually fatal, so seeking compensation can be an important aspect of dealing with the emotional, physical and financial implications of facing such a disease.

Mesothelioma is caused by exposure to asbestos. There is currently no cure, and because of where this cancer usually takes root in the body — the lining of the lungs, heart or abdomen — it cannot be surgically removed. In general, medical treatments do not focus on beating the disease, but on providing pain management and even breathing assistance to patients.

Many — although not all — victims who develop mesothelioma do so as a result of wrongful exposure. In some cases this means that an employer purposely withheld information about asbestos on the job. Others might have been informed of the presence of asbestos, but never received proper training or safety equipment. In some instances, mesothelioma victims developed the cancer after family members brought home asbestos fibers on their clothing.

Living a healthy life might seem easy enough to do in South Carolina, but avoiding dangerous substances can sometimes be difficult. When exposure to dangerous substances like asbestos results in mesothelioma, victims may be entitled to pursue a legal claim against their employer or other negligent parties. Any resulting compensation from such claims can be helpful in addressing the myriad of associated costs, including medical bills and lost wages.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Wife Sues Manufacturer Over Husband’s Mesothelioma Death

Contrary to what may be popular belief, asbestos exposure can occur virtually anywhere and at anytime, not just in the construction and manufacturing industries. The health effects of such exposure are tangible and devastating for victims who go on to develop mesothelioma. For some in South Carolina, these terrible health outcomes do not occur until years or even decades after exposure.

An out-of-state woman recently filed a lawsuit against the industrial aluminum company Novelis Corp. In her suit, she blames one of the company’s former products for exposing her late husband to asbestos back in the 1950s. The product, Snowdrift, was not originally manufactured by Novelis, but by its predecessor.

Her husband received his diagnosis of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma in Dec. 2016. He eventually died of the disease in July 2018, and his widowed wife filed the suit in late Nov. 2018. The couple had been married for just shy of 60 years when he passed away, and she is asking for a trial jury and unspecified monetary damages.

The death of a loved one from what was likely a preventable disease is one of the most difficult life experiences that some South Carolina families will ever face. When that disease is mesothelioma, a fatal cancer known to be caused by exposure to the toxic substance asbestos, the process can be that much more difficult. However, families who hold negligent parties responsible for that exposure can do much more than achieve just legal recourse for their loved one — they can also effect changes that protect future potential victims.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Asbestos Exposure, Mesothelioma More Common Than You May Think

The vast majority of people in South Carolina have likely been exposed to asbestos at some point in their life. While even small amounts of asbestos can be extremely detrimental to human health, most people will not develop mesothelioma as a result of brief, one-off exposures. However, for those who do, the results can be life-altering and devastating.

Because of its once frequent use in construction, homes built prior to the 1980s usually contain at least some asbestos. While those living in these homes might experience minimal exposure, individuals who routinely work with asbestos — such as in the mining or manufacturing industries — have much higher rates of developing asbestos-related diseases. Construction workers, firefighters, military personnel and others in related industries also suffer from higher rates of disease.

The problem is probably more common than most might think. Approximately 3,000 people are diagnosed with mesothelioma every year, and the majority of diagnoses are traced directly back to asbestos exposure. For patients whose mesothelioma is definitively linked to asbestos, the exposure generally happened decades in the past. This passage of time between exposure and the development of disease causes many people to miss this important link.

Some employers or negligent parties in South Carolina are quick to brush off the dangerous nature of asbestos. Unfortunately, this flippant attitude often culminates in asbestos exposure that leads to devastating health effects in victims. Victims who develop mesothelioma may choose to pursue a civil claim against the parties believed negligent, seeking compensation for their financial, physical and emotional damages.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

RPWB is a 2019 U.S. News Best Law Firm

CHARLESTON, S.C. – Richardson, Patrick, Westbrook & Brickman was named a 2019 Best Law Firm by U.S. News & World Report, recognizing the plaintiff firm for its work on mass torts and class actions, product liability, securities, healthcare law, medical malpractice and personal injury lawsuits.

With 16 lawyers listed on the underlying Best Lawyers in America list, RPWB was the top-listed plaintiff law firm in the country for its work on mass torts and class actions. RPWB was the top-listed plaintiff law firm in South Carolina for mass torts, personal injury and product liability.

Four RPWB attorneys were new to the list: Brady Thomas, Chris Tuck, Bobby Wood and Ken Wilson. RPWB founding member Ed Westbrook was named Lawyer of the Year for class actions and mass torts in the Charleston-area.

Here are the RPWB attorneys named to the 2019 Best Lawyers list:

Michael Brickman
Litigation – Securities
Mass Tort Litigation/Class Actions – Plaintiffs

Elizabeth Middleton Burke
Mass Tort Litigation/Class Actions – Plaintiffs
Personal Injury Litigation – Plaintiffs
Product Liability Litigation – Plaintiffs

David Butler
Personal Injury Litigation – Plaintiffs
Product Liability Litigation – Plaintiffs

Greg Lofstead
Mass Tort Litigation/Class Actions – Plaintiffs
Product Liability Litigation – Plaintiffs

Christiaan Marcum
Mass Tort Litigation/Class Actions – Plaintiffs
Product Liability Litigation – Plaintiffs

Kim Keevers Palmer
Mass Tort Litigation/Class Actions – Plaintiffs

Charles Patrick
Mass Tort Litigation/Class Actions – Plaintiffs
Product Liability Litigation – Plaintiffs

Terry Richardson
Business Litigation
Mass Tort Litigation/Class Actions – Plaintiffs
Personal Injury Litigation – Plaintiffs
Railroad Law

Tom Rogers
Medical Malpractice Law – Plaintiffs
Personal Injury Litigation – Plaintiffs

Hoyt Rowell
Health Care Law
Mass Tort Litigation/Class Actions – Plaintiffs

Chris Tuck
Mass Tort Litigation/Class Actions – Plaintiffs

Ed Westbrook
Mass Tort Litigation/Class Actions – Plaintiffs

Ken Wilson
Product Liability Litigation – Plaintiffs

Bobby Wood
Mass Tort Litigation/Class Actions – Plaintiffs

About RPWB

RPWB was formed in 2002 as a collective of talented legal minds who focus on complex litigation throughout the United States. The firm is well-respected for its work on mass torts and product liability cases, including mesothelioma lawsuits and pharmaceutical litigation. RPWB attorneys regularly hold leadership positions on class actions and other mass torts across the nation.

RPWB founding member Terry Richardson was among the first attorneys in the nation to successfully hold asbestos manufacturers liable for causing mesothelioma cancer. Several attorneys at the firm played pivotal roles in the fight against tobacco companies in the 1990s that led to the Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement. Some of those same attorneys are currently assisting six Canadian provinces seeking to recoup public healthcare spending on smoking-related illnesses.

In addition to national litigation, RPWB also represents individual people in many practice areas, including: catastrophic personal injury, truck accidents, railroad accidents, construction defects, medical malpractice, mesothelioma and other occupational lung disease, whistleblower & qui tam, nursing home abuse, pharmaceutical drugs and medical device cases.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Woman Blames Mesothelioma on Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder

South Carolina consumers trust companies to provide safe and effective products. When these expectations are violated, an individual’s safety, health and well-being may be at risk. An out-of-state woman is currently seeking $28 million from Johnson & Johnson, claiming that baby powder contaminated with asbestos caused her to develop mesothelioma.

The woman claims that she used Johnson & Johnson brand baby powder for around 40 years. Testing of one of her bottles of baby powder revealed that there were 25,000 fibers of asbestos in every gram of talc powder. This amounted to 6 million individual fibers in a single bottle. Her suit alleges that she was routinely exposed to this asbestos over the course of her decades of use, which ultimately caused her cancer.

Both Johnson & Johnson and its co-defendant, Imerys Talc America, deny these claims. Instead, they insist that her mesothelioma must have spontaneously developed. It is not clear if they have any evidence from her medical records or health history to support this claim.

This is not the first or only lawsuit that Johnson & Johnson is facing over its baby powder. Hundreds of other women are also pursuing claims, accusing the company of producing unsafe products that it advertised as both effective and safe. While the majority of these suits involve claims of ovarian cancer, mesothelioma is also cited in some.

Cancer of any type is devastating, but victims who develop mesothelioma usually do so not because of their own actions or a genetic predisposition, but because of negligent asbestos exposure. Victims in South Carolina often find that compensation can help address the financial, physical and emotional damages of their illness. However, since most must demonstrate negligence from years if not decades ago, keeping important records regarding exposure, doctors visits and more can be helpful.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Pathologist Testifies During Victim’s Mesothelioma Lawsuit

Baby powder was once largely comprised of talc, a substance that is frequently contaminated with asbestos. In the past, this type of talc baby powder was a commonly-used substance by many in South Carolina, and now some residents may be developing devastating health consequences. Exposure to asbestos is known to cause the deadly cancer mesothelioma.

A pathology expert recently testified in an out-of-state courtroom on behalf of a woman suing Johnson & Johnson. Her suit claims that the company’s talc-based baby powder caused her to develop mesothelioma, which leaves victims with an average life expectancy of about two years. It is generally accepted that it takes about 10 years from the time of exposure to the development of mesothelioma tumors.

During court, the pathologist explained that mesothelioma tumors are a type of signal tumor. Signal tumors indicate a specific cause for a cancer, and as he explained, mesothelioma’s is a signal for exposure to asbestos. He did state that in extremely rare cases certain other natural fibers could sometimes cause a person to develop mesothelioma, but that the real cause is almost always asbestos.

With limited life expectancy and considerable medical bills along the way, victims who develop mesothelioma often feel extremely disheartened. However, compensation for South Carolina victims may be possible. Holding companies accountable through the careful actions of a civil suit not only help victims address the financial side of their damages, it can also force the companies to make necessary changes that protect future consumers from suffering similar outcomes.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts