ClickCease

Bank of America Deceptive Credit Card Practices

RPWB attorneys are investigating potentially illegal and deceptive practices by Bank of America, including allegations that the bank applied for and opened credit card accounts without customers’ consent.

Our attorneys are seeking to speak with current and former Bank of America customers who had credit card accounts opened by the bank without their approval. If this applies to you, please contact us by using the form below. Your assistance in this matter will help our investigation and, in the event that litigation is filed, your participation could make you eligible for financial compensation. There is no cost for you to consult with an attorney.

Start Your Free Case Review

    Are you a current of former Bank of America customer?
    CurrentFormerNot Sure

    Did Bank of America open a credit card without your approval?
    YesNoNot Sure

    If so, when did this occur?

    Disclaimer
    I agree to the following: This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented on this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.

    Bank of America Incentivized Employees to Open Unauthorized Accounts

    From 2012 to 2022, Bank of America had an incentive system that encouraged employees to open up credit card accounts for its customers, even if the customer never wanted one.

    In July 2023, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ordered Bank of America to repay its customers $100 million for falsifying credit card applications and for charging customers “junk fees” on things like overdraft protection that were sometimes charged multiple times for a single transaction. In addition, the government fined Bank of America $150 million for engaging in these practices.

    Despite the action by the federal government, many Bank of America customers were not made whole. The bank’s actions have impacted customers’ credit scores, caused customers to pay monthly account fees and, in some cases, necessitated the use of credit monitoring services.

    If you were impacted by Bank of America’s scheme of opening unwanted credit card accounts, please contact us by using the form on this webpage. Your help with our investigation will enable us to gather the necessary facts to hold Bank of America accountable for its alleged illegal and deceptive business practices.

    Our Experienced Lawyers

    How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

    Contact Us

    Case Types

    Related Posts

    Chemical Hair Straightener Cancer Lawsuits

    Chemical Hair Straighteners Linked To Uterine And Ovarian Cancer

    RPWB attorneys represent dozens of women nationwide who developed uterine (including endometrial) and ovarian cancers after using chemical hair straighteners or chemical hair relaxers.

    The hair relaxers manufactured by L’Oreal, Strength of Nature, Soft Sheen, Dabur and Namaste Laboratories contain potentially dangerous chemicals that could increase a woman’s risk of developing uterine and other cancers. Brand names of the hair relaxers include: Motions, Dark & Lovely, Soft &  Beautiful, Optimum Care, Just for Me, Carson Soft Sheen, Hawaiian Silky, Ultra Sheen, TCB and ORS Olive Oil.

    A recent study published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute found that regular users of chemical hair straighteners or relaxers are twice as likely as those who don’t use the products to develop uterine cancer. The study defined regular use of chemical hair straighteners or relaxers as four or more times per year.

    Endometrial cancer is one of the most common types of uterine cancer and is particularly prevalent among African American women.

    The recent study follows others that demonstrated that hair products can increase the chances of other cancers, including ovarian cancer.

    If you have used chemical hair straighteners or hair relaxers and have developed uterine cancer, endometrial cancer or ovarian cancer please contact us without delay to begin a free, no obligation case review. RPWB is one of the top mass tort law firms in the country, according to U.S. News & World Report. Please fill out the form below to get started or give us a call 24/7 at 843-727-6500.

    Start Your Free Case Review

    Did you use chemical hair straighteners or relaxers on a regular basis?
    Do you suffer from uterine, ovarian or endometrial cancer?
    Disclaimer

    Hair Straighteners Can Lead to Dangerous Chemicals Entering the Body

    Hair straighteners or relaxers are used by many women to change their hair type. The products contain chemicals that break down the external structure of the hair so that it appears more flat. As the hair grows out, many women reapply or “re-touch” near the roots of the hair throughout the year to maintain their look.

    Hair products do not require FDA approval for being sold to consumers, but they are supposed to be safe for consumers to use. However, hair straighteners or relaxers contain potentially dangerous chemicals including sodium hydroxide, calcium hydroxide, guanidine carbonate and thioglycolic acid salts – all of which can damage the scalp. It is believed that this damage to the scalp allows cancer-causing chemicals such as phthalates to enter the bloodstream, resulting in an increased risk of uterine cancer.

    Phthalates are commonly found in fragrances used in hair care products and are known to be “endocrine disrupting chemicals,” which can affect hormone levels in the body.

    First Chemical Hair Straightener Lawsuit Filed

    The first hair straightener lawsuit was filed in October 2022 in federal court in Illinois in the days after the release of the groundbreaking study that demonstrated a link between uterine cancer and hair straightening products.

    News of the potential link between chemical hair straighteners and uterine cancer comes as a shock to many women who used these products without being made aware of possible risks including uterine and endometrial cancer. RPWB expects that many additional women diagnosed with uterine cancer will begin to come forward and that additional lawsuits will be filed in the coming months.

    If you have been diagnosed with uterine, endometrial or ovarian cancer, please contact us for a free case review. RPWB represents people nationwide who have been harmed by dangerous products. Our firm is ranked by U.S. News & World Report as one of the top mass tort law firms in the country and we would be honored to represent you in this very important case that has the potential of helping many women who were unaware of the risks.

    Start Your Free Case Review

    Did you use chemical hair straighteners or relaxers on a regular basis?
    Do you suffer from uterine, ovarian or endometrial cancer?
    Disclaimer

    Our Experienced Lawyers

    How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

    Contact Us

    Case Types

    Related Posts

    Paraquat Weed Killer Lawsuit

    Paraquat, A Popular Weed Killer, Puts Farmers At Risk

    Farmers, agricultural workers and groundskeepers who developed Parkinson’s disease after using the weed killer Paraquat might be eligible for compensation. A growing number of Paraquat lawsuits implicating the toxic weed killer for causing Parkinson’s Disease have been filed throughout the country.

    RPWB’s toxic exposure attorneys are reviewing cases of patients who developed Parkinson’s disease after exposure to herbicides containing Paraquat. Common products containing the chemical include: Gramoxone, Ortho-Paraquat, Para-SHOT, Parazone, Quick-Quat, Firestorm and Helmqua. Patients with Parkinson’s disease who had repeated exposure to Paraquat should consult with an experienced toxic exposure attorney without delay to see if their case can be included in national litigation against the manufacturers.

    Start Your Free Paraquat Case Review

    Did you use Paraquat?
    Were you diagnosed with Parkinson's disease?
    Disclaimer

    Give Us A Call

    843-727-6500

    The Link Between Paraquat And Parkinson’s Disease

    A growing body of science points to Paraquat as a cause of Parkinson’s disease.

    In his recent book, Dr. Bastiaan Bloem, a prominent neurologist who has published more than 700 scientific papers and chapters on Parkinson’s Disease, points to the tight link between exposure to herbicides such as paraquat — a weed killer — and the risk of developing Parkinson’s.

    “These chemicals were introduced worldwide after World War II, and many are still used today on our fields,” he said. “For this reason, farmers are at a markedly increased risk of developing Parkinson’s. If you feed a mouse paraquat — which is banned in China but not the U.S. — it will kill the dopamine-producing cells in the brain. These chemicals are tremendously toxic to the brain and have even been detected in milk, in supermarkets.”

    A recent study, published in the journal Toxicological Sciences in December 2020, confirmed that inhaling Paraquat gives it a direct pathway to the brain, where other studies have shown that it can impair dopamine receptors. Parkinson’s disease occurs when nerve cells in an area of the brain that controls movement become impaired or die. Normally, these neurons produce dopamine. When the neurons die or become impaired, they produce less dopamine, which causes the movement problems of Parkinson’s.

    Common symptoms associated with Parkinson’s disease include shaking or tremors, stiffness and difficulty with walking, balance and coordination. As the disease progresses, it can affect a person’s ability to talk and chew food. It can be associated with memory loss and other behavioral issues.

    In 2020, the EPA released new guidelines about the application of Paraquat seeking to reduce human exposure to the chemical, which is known to be toxic.

    Click here to begin your free, no obligation case review.

    Who Is at Risk?

    The use of Paraquat in the United States began in 1964, and continues to this day despite other governments such as China and the Europeon Union already banning it. It is typically used in agricultural settings, but also is used on golf courses and in grounds maintenance at large facilities such as schools, parks, factories and other industrial sites. The people most impacted are those who mixed the chemicals or inhaled them during or just after application. This includes:

    • Farmers
    • Ranchers
    • Farm-workers
    • Aerial applicators
    • Groundskeepers
    • Landscapers
    • Maintenance workers

    Paraquat is used for weed control in many types of farming, including wide use by corn, soybean, tobacco and cotton farmers.

    In October 2020, the EPA proposed new guidelines that would limit the use of Paraquat weed killers, including a prohibition of aerial application (except for cotton desiccation), requiring enclosed cabs and respirators, and creating a longer re-entry waiting period.

    RPWB has a Strong Record with Toxic Exposure Cases

    Attorneys at RPWB have been helping people harmed by dangerous products for more than 40 years. This includes asbestos victims, and more recently, those who developed non-Hodgkin lymphoma from using another popular weed killer, Roundup. We are in the leadership of national litigation against 3M for producing a toxic fire-fighting foam that is contaminating water systems throughout the United States. We have experience helping farmers as well. We recently helped corn farmers get compensation for financial losses they incurred when corn prices plummeted following China’s rejection of Syngenta GMO corn.

    RPWB is a U.S. News & World Report Best Law Firm. Fifteen of our attorneys appear on the Best Lawyers in America List, and six are listed on Super Lawyers.

    Start Your Free Case Review

    Did you use Paraquat?
    Were you diagnosed with Parkinson's disease?
    Disclaimer

    Give Us A Call

    843-727-6500

    Our Experienced Lawyers

    How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

    Contact Us

    Case Types

    Related Posts

    Combat Arms Ear Plugs Settlement

    RPWB is No Longer Accepting New Combat Arms Earplugs Cases

    On August 29, 3M Company agreed to pay just over $6 billion to resolve the nearly 250,000 lawsuits filed by United States military Service Members, Veterans, and commercial users (including military contractors), alleging CAE-related injuries from use of the CAE for hearing protection.  The Settlement also involves thousands of similar CAE claims in Minnesota state court.

    If you are a current CAE client, please keep an eye out for regular email updates regarding the settlement of your claim.

    Contact Number

    1-888-293-6883

    Our Experienced Lawyers

    How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

    Contact Us

    Case Types

    Related Posts

    Gas Can Explosions

    Gas can manufacturers are resisting a 5 cent part that could save lives.

    RPWB attorneys have represented 55 victims of gas can explosions and have recovered $100 million from gas can manufacturers and the retailers who continue to sell the dangerous products.

    We are currently working on gas can explosion lawsuits involving the following products:

    • Blitz Gas Cans
    • Scepter Gas Cans
    • Midwest Can
    • Wedco Gas Cans

    If you were burned while using any of these gas cans, please contact us so we can explain your legal rights and the potential for compensation to help cover medical costs, lost wages and the pain and suffering you endured.

    The problem with all of these gas cans is that they don’t include a safety part called a flame arrestor, which is a small plastic or metal part that prevents flames from spreading into the can. Without the small pieces of mesh or discs with holes, flames are able to ignite the gasoline and gas vapors inside of the can, causing more significant injuries and more fatalities.[1]

    The National Consumer Safety Council issued a statement in November 2013 for flame arrestors to be added to all gas cans, yet many manufacturers still have not put the inexpensive parts in the gas cans sold on shelves throughout the United States.

    RPWB attorneys have a long history of helping burn victims. We have represented many people who were burned or killed by defective products, including gas cans, deep fryers and gas grills. We are a 2020 U.S. News & World Report Best Law Firm[2] and are one of the top product liability law firms in the country. [3]

    If you or a loved one was hurt by an exploding gas can, please contact us without delay.

    Start Your Free Case Review

    Disclaimer

    Give Us A Call

    1-888-293-6883

    Our Experienced Lawyers

    How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

    Contact Us

    Case Types

    Related Posts

    Defective Medical Products

    RPWB is nationally recognized for representing individuals who have been harmed by medical devices and pharmaceutical drugs.

    Our attorneys have successfully represented thousands of people hurt by defective medical devices. We are strong advocates for the industry to be better regulated so that only safe devices are brought to market. RPWB has the experience, reputation, skill and capacity for leading these large, complex cases against powerful corporations and the nation’s top defense attorneys.

    RPWB is currently accepting cases involving the following medical devices:

    Why Choose RPWB

    We are nationally recognized for representing individuals who have been harmed by medical devices and pharmaceutical drugs. U.S. News & World Report lists us as a 2022 Best Law Firm in the areas of products liability and personal injury litigation. We are a top-listed plaintiff product liability firm as rated by Best Lawyers in America.

    RPWB has substantial national experience with products liability litigation against drug makers and medical device manufacturers. We served on the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee for a consolidated action involving the Norplant contraceptive system and worked on the national multidistrict litigation against the manufacturers of hip and jaw implants.

    RPWB attorneys have been appointed lead counsel of seven nationwide multidistrict litigations in recent years. We currently serve or have recently served on various National Plaintiffs’ Steering Committees for consolidated litigation involving: 3M Combat Arms Military Earplugs, Aqueous Film-Forming Foams (AFFF) Products Liability Litigation, Baycol®, Chantix®, Lipitor®, Ortho Evra®, Phenylpropanolamine (PPA), Rezulin® and Zyprexa®.

    Our work has resulted in large settlements. We were heavily involved in national litigation against several manufacturers of breast implants for selling defective products, including a prominent role in the MDL against Dow Corning that resulted in a $3.2 billion settlement for 400,000 women.

    Get the Help You Need

    See why RPWB is trusted by many thousands of people harmed by pharmaceutical drugs and medical devices throughout the United States. Start your free, no obligation case review today to see first-hand why some many people trust RPWB.

    Start Your Free Case Review

    Disclaimer

    Give Us A Call

    1-888-293-6883

    Our Experienced Lawyers

    How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

    Contact Us

    Case Types

    Related Posts

    Drug Injury

    Having held leadership positions in many national drug lawsuits, RPWB is home to some of the top pharmaceutical lawyers in the country.

    RPWB is nationally recognized for representing individuals who have been harmed by prescription and non-prescription drugs as well as medical devices. Often times, patients are not given adequate warning of potentially life-threatening side effects.

    Our attorneys have successfully represented thousands of people harmed by the pharmaceutical industry. We are strong advocates for the industry to implement better practices in order to bring safer drugs to market. RPWB has the experience, reputation, skill and capacity for leading these large, complex cases against powerful corporations and the nation’s top defense attorneys.

    RPWB is currently accepting cases involving the following drugs:

    Why You Should Choose RPWB

    We are nationally recognized for representing individuals who have been harmed by prescription and non-prescription drugs as well as medical devices. U.S. News & World Report lists us as a Best Law Firm in the areas of products liability and personal injury litigation. We are a top-listed plaintiff product liability firm as rated by Best Lawyers in America.

    Our firm has substantial experience with products liability litigation against drug makers and medical device manufacturers.

    RPWB attorneys have been appointed lead counsel of seven nationwide multidistrict litigations in recent years. We currently serve or have recently served on various National Plaintiffs’ Steering Committees for consolidated litigation involving: Baycol®, Chantix®, Lipitor®, Ortho Evra®, Phenylpropanolamine (PPA), Rezulin® and Zyprexa®.

    Our work has resulted in large settlements. We were heavily involved in national litigation against several manufacturers of breast implants for selling defective products, including a prominent role in the MDL against Dow Corning that resulted in a $3.2 billion settlement for 400,000 women.

    Get the Help You Need

    See why RPWB is trusted by many thousands of people harmed by pharmaceutical drugs and medical devices throughout the United States. Start your free, no obligation case review today to see first-hand why some many people harmed by the pharmaceutical drug industry trust RPWB.

    Start Your Free Case Review

    Disclaimer

    Give Us A Call

    1-888-293-6883

    Our Experienced Lawyers

    How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

    Contact Us

    Case Types

    Related Posts

    Business Litigation

    Representing Businesses And Individuals

    Rogers, Patrick Westbrook & Brickman represents businesses and individuals in complex business torts and commercial litigation. These cases include disputes between competitors, joint ventures, partners, shareholders, lenders and borrowers, franchisees and franchisors, and related commercial disputes. Tort and commercial litigation cases are generally extremely complex, and they require an immense knowledge of both law and business. RPWB’s attorneys not only have this knowledge, they also have the significant staff and financial resources to investigate and prepare these cases for successful resolution.

    The firm’s current business practice includes the representation of medical providers in antitrust, qui tam, and insurer disputes. RPWB, unlike many business practices in other law firms, will work with its business clients to bring litigations on a contingent fee basis.

    Please contact us if you have any questions or want to inquire about representation from one of our business litigation attorneys.

    Start Your Free Case Review

    Disclaimer

    Give Us A Call

    1-888-293-6883

    Our Experienced Lawyers

    How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

    Contact Us

    Case Types

    Related Posts

    Vehicle Defects & Warranty Issues

    A Top Law Firm For Vehicle Defect And Personal Injury Cases

    Experienced Vehicle Defect Lawyers

    RPWB personal injury attorneys have successfully litigated many cases against most of the major manufacturers of heavy trucks, automobiles, and SUVs. Our attorneys have successfully resolved claims for deaths and injuries resulting from—

    • Seatbelt defects
    • Heavy truck and vehicle rollovers
    • Tire defects
    • Roof structure defects
    • Airbag injuries
    • Park-to-reverse transmission slips
    • Fuel system defects

     

    The reality is that when you have been injured in a vehicular accident, the extent and severity of your injuries and the liability of the parties who may be responsible for your suffering can be hard to identify. There may be several parties to contend with in order to get full compensation for your current losses and future expenses.

    We have the experience to identify vehicle defects that may have caused what otherwise appears to have been an ordinary accident. RPWB is a top-rated product liability law firm by Best Lawyers. There are important steps that should be immediately taken to preserve evidence necessary to prove a defect case, so do not delay in contacting us for a free consultation.

    Start Your Free Case Review

    Disclaimer

    Give Us A Call

    1-888-293-6883

    Our Experienced Lawyers

    How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

    Contact Us

    Case Types

    Related Posts

    Securities Fraud

    Recovering Damages For Victims

    RPWB is dedicated to helping investors recover losses caused by corporate fraud or securities account mismanagement. The firm has played a lead role in numerous complex and ground-breaking litigation matters on behalf of stockholders and other victims injured by corporate fraud, breaches of fiduciary duty, and financial wrongdoing.

    RPWB has been at the forefront of protecting shareholders’ investments.  It aggressively pursues claims against brokerage firms for providing unfounded investment advice and failing to disclose conflicts of interest. RPWB attorneys also have experience with claims against brokerage firms and individual brokers for fraudulent and negligent mismanagement of investor accounts. The firm is prominently involved in—

    • Derivative cases
    • Protecting mutual fund investors against excessive advisory fee abuses

    These are very complex cases and many have been recognized as such by the courts. In addition, because of the nature of the fraud and the reach of the defendants, a substantial number of cases have become multidistrict litigation. RPWB securities fraud attorneys have the knowledge, experience, and resources to successfully handle these cases.

    Start Your Free Case Review

    Disclaimer

    Give Us A Call

    1-888-293-6883

    Our Experienced Lawyers

    How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

    Contact Us

    Case Types

    Related Posts