ClickCease

Firefighters Suffered Asbestos Exposure in Training

South Carolina firefighters understand that they may be exposed to a host of dangerous substances during the course of their employment. This exposure, however, usually comes from active fires that firefighters work to contain and eliminate. Few, if any, expect that they will have to deal with unknown asbestos exposure during training.

Earlier in 2018, a group of out-of-state firefighters participated in a demolition burn for training purposes. The deputy chief’s friend had previously offered a home that he apparently owned but no longer needed for the demolition training. However, simply burning a home for training purposes is not a quick process. The Environmental Protection Agency requires that any structure being burned must first have any asbestos removed.

That process never happened with this burn. Although the burn was temporarily put on pause after some people expressed concern that the home could harbor hidden asbestos, it eventually went ahead without the proper safety measures. Afterwards, several firefighters submitted asbestos exposure forms. The fire chief apologized but blamed the matter on miscommunication and too many people handling the necessary paperwork. No one in the department has been disciplined for the matter.

Asbestos exposure is no small matter. Victims typically develop lifelong health complications, with many suffering from the fatal cancer mesothelioma. For people in South Carolina who fight this deadly cancer, seeing a fire chief take such a cavalier approach to a serious topic can be upsetting. Compensation is often necessary to fully address the reality of the health affects created by the dangerous substance asbestos, which most victims achieve through carefully pursued civil suits.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Asbestos Exposure Could Increase Because of EPA’s New Policy

There is no denying the devastating effect that asbestos has on countless mesothelioma sufferers. South Carolina victims of asbestos exposure often deal with serious and debilitating health effects even before they develop the deadly cancer. Now, new limited analysis at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency will put even more individuals at risk for asbestos exposure and subsequent illness.

The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 was amended in 2016, mandating that the EPA evaluate hazardous materials and chemicals, then determine if those chemicals should be restricted or even banned. Now, the EPA is narrowing its risk factors for 10 of those substances. The agency will no longer consider the health risks of exposure to harmful substances through soil, air or water that has been contaminated, and will instead only assess the dangers of directly touching a chemical or material.

When it comes to asbestos, only new uses will be reviewed. The danger of existing asbestos will no longer be on the EPA’s radar, which could put an untold number of people at risk for possible exposure. Asbestos is not the only chemical that the EPA is lowering its standards for. Perchloroethylene is a likely carcinogen that is largely used for dry-cleaning purposes, but the EPA will not consider any harm caused by contaminated drinking water, which is a problem in 44 states.

An estimate from the Environmental Defense Fund states that the EPA will ignore 68 million lbs. worth of worrying emissions annually. Limited analysis may also increase the risk for asbestos exposure in South Carolina. Those who develop mesothelioma or other deadly health effects from asbestos often require compensation through carefully pursued civil suits in order to fully address the financial, physical and emotional aspect of their injuries.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

USDA Workers Worried About Asbestos Exposure

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is charged with keeping the country’s food supply safe, but some employees say they are the ones facing health risks. The current USDA headquarters is undergoing a renovation and making some workers worried. Many claim that the renovations are putting them at risk for asbestos exposure.

In late March 2018, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration — which also helps protect workplaces in South Carolina and across the country — began investigating USDA worker complaints. The workers’ union had previously claimed that management did not provide adequate notice about the presence of lead paint and asbestos during renovations. It also accused the management team of failing to erect physical barriers that would safely quarantine workers from the renovations.

The USDA was also accused of not providing adequate telecommuting accommodations during renovations. The agency recently cracked down on telecommuting requests, despite several workers suddenly feeling sick during the ongoing renovations. The USDA denied these claims, saying it gave workers the choice to either share desks with other workers in the building or to work from home. However, it is not clear how this would work with the current policy that requires telecommuting workers to be in the office at least four days a week.

A professor of public health from an area university believes that the USDA is not only behaving wrongly, but that it is putting its workers at serious risk for long-term health effects. A USDA employee whose father died due to asbestos poisoning agrees. She believes the agency is not taking the health of its workers seriously.

The OSHA investigation is still ongoing. It can be difficult waiting for the results of such an investigation, which will determine whether an employer will be cited for any serious wrongdoing or lapse in safety protocols. However, OSHA results can be essential for South Carolina workers who are the victims of asbestos exposure, as this information may help in the litigation of a civil lawsuit.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Worker Who Found Out About Asbestos Exposure Placed on Leave

South Carolina employers who know of asbestos risks must not only inform workers who may be exposed to it on the job but must also provide proper training and equipment to keep them as safe as possible. If employers fail in their duties, they may be held accountable for injuries suffered by employees. In another state, a situation involving asbestos exposure has led to a lawsuit filed by a worker who says his employers retaliated against him to keep him quiet.

The worker’s job included supervising juveniles in detention. A group of six youths were assigned to help renovate cottages as part of a $52 million upgrade project. The man said that during one work session, his boss told him to hurry and cover up some of the walls where he and the other workers had been removing paneling.

The boss reportedly told the supervisor that the area was laden with asbestos, and he needed it all covered up so that a group of public officials coming through in the near future would not see it. The supervisor later stated that he was shocked that his superior was aware of the asbestos but had never informed any of the workers. To make matters worse, the supervisor and one of his co-workers were placed on administrative leave that same day.

The employer accused the supervisor of wrongdoing in connection with juveniles who had allegedly been hiding contraband in the cottages. The worker says the allegations were fabricated as an excuse to take him off the job because of the asbestos situation. No level of asbestos exposure is safe. The worker filed a complaint with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Anyone in South Carolina facing similar problems can reach out for immediate legal support.

Source: statesmanjournal.com, “Whistleblower suit says MacLaren workers, students exposed to asbestos“, Tracy Loew, May 2, 2018

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Asbestos Exposure Among Veterans in Military Ships

Today, many military veterans are being diagnosed with mesothelioma, due to exposure to asbestos that occurred decades ago.

Years ago, asbestos was used widely for its insulating and fireproofing properties. Many branches of the military used asbestos, but perhaps none more than the Navy, which used it excessively in shipbuilding.

Although the Navy stopped using asbestos for shipbuilding in the 1970s, ships containing asbestos products were used for many years after. This means thousands of Navy members were exposed to asbestos for decades.

Members of the Navy and other branches of the armed forces were often exposed to asbestos on ships, but the exposure could have also occurred in mines, when working with insulation, while installing piping, roofing, and other products, and more. Decades later, much to their surprise, many of these individuals have faced devastating mesothelioma diagnoses.

Members of the U.S. armed services faithfully served their country, and were exposed to a very dangerous substance that put their health in jeopardy. These individuals have legal rights and options. Even if the victim has passed away, family members may still have legal options.

Military veterans who were exposed to asbestos on ships and later developed mesothelioma may be eligible for significant compensation. Talk to an attorney from Richardson, Patrick, Westbrook & Brickman in a free consultation.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

City Official Says Asbestos Exposure Possible at Vacant Apartment

Many apartment buildings, homes and business complexes in South Carolina currently stand vacant for various reasons. Some are scheduled for demolition and may pose some of the same health risks that an evacuated apartment building in another state was recently found to contain. This particular building poses an asbestos exposure risk to any and all who occupy the premises.

The apartment has been empty since 2010 when then occupants were evacuated because of a flood caused by a torrential rainstorm. A post-storm inspection of the property revealed that building officials had reportedly committed nine separate maintenance violations. The city was preparing to demolish the building when those plans were halted due to new information regarding asbestos throughout the structure.

The apartment complex is apparently riddled with high levels of asbestos in its exterior plaster as well as window glazing, flooring and other areas of the building. Because serious health hazards exist from ingesting or inhaling microscopic fibers contained in asbestos, there are strict federal regulations governing the removal process. In fact, only certified workers may conduct an abatement project.

Sadly, many South Carolina workers and residents understand all too well how devastating the results of asbestos exposure can be. There are currently thousands of people throughout the state and nation suffering various forms of respiratory illness and cancer, such as mesothelioma, directly related to their exposure to asbestos at work or in their homes. There are also many active litigation cases involving victims seeking recoveries for their losses in situations where their illnesses were caused by other people’s negligence.

Source: U.S. News & World Report, “Tests find asbestos throughout shuttered apartment complex“, April 28, 2018

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

New Bill Would Limit Indiana Mesothelioma Victims’ Rights

Mesothelioma is a type of cancer with one known cause: Exposure to asbestos.

When someone is diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestos exposure decades ago can usually be pinpointed. Often, this exposure occurred in a work setting.

A mesothelioma diagnosis is devastating to the victim and family members, but many find closure by pursuing a legal claim against the company that exposed its workers to asbestos.

In 2016, the Indiana State Supreme Court upheld a previous court ruling that allowed mesothelioma victims to pursue a claim long after the exposure occurred. Due to the unique nature of this cancer – the fact that it usually takes decades to fully develop – this allowed mesothelioma victims in Indiana to seek legal help at an appropriate time.

But a new bill that is going through Indiana’s General Assembly could undo the Supreme Court’s ruling. The bill would reinstate the statute of repose – which means victims would only have 10 years from the date of exposure to file a claim.

This is problematic because mesothelioma is often diagnosed several decades after asbestos exposure occurred. This could greatly limit the rights of mesothelioma victims who are seeking legal recourse in Indiana.

Additionally, the bill would limit individuals whose diagnoses occurred more than 15 years after asbestos exposure. Again, this is rare, since mesothelioma is diagnosed so much later than when the asbestos exposure occurred.

If the bill passes, Indiana will be the only state that restricts mesothelioma victims in this way.

Victims should be able to seek legal recourse after a mesothelioma diagnosis, no matter when the asbestos exposure occurred.

If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, talk to one of our attorneys in a free consultation. We represent clients nationwide.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Yet Another Health Danger Associated With Asbestos Exposure

Most South Carolina residents are aware of the risks associated with the microscopic fibers often found in ceiling tiles, flooring, cabinetry and other construction materials; still, new information continues to surface as more and more people report symptoms of ill health. Asbestos exposure is now believed to cause laryngeal cancer, a rare disease that begins in a person’s larynx, otherwise known as the voice box. The larynx is located high in the trachea and the first sign of such illness is often a voice change.

When a person’s voice takes on a high pitch, raspy tone, there may be an underlying cause. If that person thinks he or she may have been exposed to asbestos at some point, it’s always best to seek immediate medical attention to rule out possible illness related to the exposure. There are several other symptoms that may signify laryngeal cancer as well.

People with this rare form of cancer often develop ear infections. Their throats may swell, too, which can result in difficulties or discomfort when swallowing. It’s never a good idea to ignore such symptoms as they may turn out to be something minor and easily treatable but may also be signs of serious illness that necessitates specialized care.

People who work in factories, old school buildings or other older structures are vulnerable. And shipyards and automotive manufacturing plants are especially at risk for asbestos exposure and subsequent illness. It’s common for many questions to arise if someone thinks another party is responsible for an asbestos-related disease. Perhaps an employer tried to cut corners to save time and did follow proper protocol regarding asbestos abatement. A South Carolina victim of asbestos illness could pursue recovery for losses against the employer if he or she dropped the ball regarding informing the worker of possible danger and supplying all necessary safety equipment on the job.

Source: reportshealthcare.com, “Asbestos- Linked With Laryngeal Cancer”, Ammara Perveen, April 17, 2018

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Asbestos Exposure A Concern For South Carolina Parents, Others

Most parents of preteens and teenagers in South Carolina and beyond have heard of or have visited Claire’s and/or Justice jewelry stores. Bangles, earrings, cool clothing and cosmetics are all available. However, news headlines say consumers may also be getting something else with their purchases: asbestos exposure.

Both stores sell cosmetics, including glittery powders, eye-shadow and other products meant to be applied directly onto the skin. Last year, asbestos, a dangerous combination of microscopic fibers, was found in Justice’s shimmer powder products. More recently, an entire line of cosmetic products at Claire’s reportedly tested positive for asbestos; the store has denied the claim but has pulled all products in question from its shelves while an investigation continues.

A senior vice president for an environmental group stated that companies are still permitted to manufacture goods containing asbestos for sale throughout the nation. The rule is that the level of asbestos must be less than 1 percent. This may surprise many consumers, especially parents of children who use cosmetics, since no level of exposure to asbestos is thought to be safe.

A spokesperson for a website that advocates for nontoxic health and beauty products said total label transparency is needed in the United States, so consumers can make informed decisions about the cosmetics and other products they are using on their bodies. Any parent, worker or consumer in South Carolina who wishes to discuss a particular asbestos exposure problem can reach out for support. Such situations often lead to litigation when people contract serious illnesses in connection with asbestos exposure and certain parties are deemed responsible for their suffering.

Source: goop.com, “Asbestos in Makeup For Kids Is Legal-and Totally Happening in this Country“, Accessed on April 21, 2018

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

University in South Carolina Reports Asbestos Exposure Risk

In South Carolina and all states, university officials are obligated to do whatever they can to keep students, faculty and visitors to their campuses as safe as possible. Carolina Coastal University recently announced that it has temporarily shut down its auditorium due to an asbestos exposure risk. Administrators say all events scheduled to take place in the auditorium are being canceled, postponed or moved to other venues.

The stage in the auditorium contains a fire curtain that is apparently quite old. Annual operational testing is done on it to ensure that it’s in good working order. The curtain was also tested for asbestos, which showed that it did indeed contain low concentrations of the material.

Further testing was conducted that involved lowering and raising the curtain from the stage several times. The stage itself was then wiped for samples that were also tested for asbestos. Administrators were dismayed to learn that the stage tested positive for potentially dangerous microscopic particles that are known to cause infectious and even fatal diseases if ingested or inhaled.

Officials were quick to report that the air quality level in the auditorium tested below the levels set as high risk by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. To be safe, however, they ordered the auditorium closed until the fire curtain can be replaced and asbestos properly removed from the premises. Many older schools, factories, work areas and even homes in South Carolina present asbestos exposure risks for employees, homeowners and others. Those who wish to discuss the legal implications of a particular matter may request a meeting with an experienced asbestos litigation attorney.

Source: wpde.com, “CCU auditorium closed ‘until further notice’ after asbestos found“, Accessed on April 17, 2018

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts