ClickCease

Lung Cancer Patient files Asbestos Exposure Lawsuit

South Carolina residents currently suffering adverse health conditions they believe are related to workplace toxins may want to follow an ongoing case in another state. It involves a married couple who have filed a legal claim against several parties. The claim states that the man’s lung cancer is directly related to repeated asbestos exposure during the normal course of his work duties in a 50-year career.

The claim asserts that various companies should be held legally accountable for negligence because they failed to exercise appropriate caution to keep people using or exposed to their products safe. The man has been diagnosed with lung cancer believed to have been caused by repeated asbestos exposure. He claims he ingested the dangerous, microscopic fibers each time he was near products manufactured, distributed or installed by the defendants.

Many people in South Carolina can relate to the financial hardship the man says he experienced when medical bills started rolling in regarding his cancer treatments. He is and his wife are seeking $50,000 or more in compensatory damages. As do most people planning to navigate the civil justice system, the plaintiffs in this case have hired attorneys to represent them in court.

The dangers associated with asbestos exposure are well-known in South Carolina and throughout the nation. Any employer, manufacturer, sales distributor or other party who knowingly places consumers or workers in harm’s way without proper notification or training, as appropriate in a given situation, may be financially responsible for negligence when workers or consumers suffer serious injuries as a result. It makes sense to consult with an experienced personal injury attorney before filing an asbestos-related claim because the laws regarding such matters are highly complex and stress associated with litigation may be lessened when acting alongside skilled guidance.

Source: madisonrecord.com, “Couple claims husband’s cancer caused by asbestos exposure“, Lhalie Castillo, April 15, 2018

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Johnson & Johnson Held Liable in Asbestos Exposure Lawsuit

For more than two months, a court in another state has been hearing arguments in a case regarding one man’s illness. Approximately two years ago, the man was diagnosed with mesothelioma, a deadly cancer often caused by asbestos exposure with which many South Carolina residents are familiar. In this case, the man sought compensation for damages against Johnson & Johnson, claiming its talcum powder products placed him in harm’s way and his illness is directly related to using the products from 1972 through the early 2000s.

While mesothelioma often attacks the lungs, it can also be found in the abdomen or heart as well. In most cases, the underlying cause is ingestion of microscopic fibers contained in asbestos products. The man in this situation says he used Johnson & Johnson’s talcum products for years and alleges it is the primary cause of his cancer.

The jury voted to award the man $30 million and also for his wife to receive $7 million in compensation for damages she suffered as a result of her husband’s illness. A spokesman for Johnson & Johnson adamantly stated that the company’s talc products do not contain asbestos. The spokesman said the company is extremely disappointed with the court’s decision to hold it accountable for 70 percent of the damages listed in the claim.

While this was not the first time Johnson & Johnson has been sued regarding asbestos exposure and its talcum products, it is first time a court has ruled against the company in a trial concerning these issues. Many South Carolina residents are concerned about asbestos-related incidents. Those who believe they have grounds for filing a legal claim may wish to speak with an attorney experienced in asbestos litigation.

Source: USA Today, “Johnson & Johnson hit with $37M verdict in asbestos-related cancer lawsuit“, Dave Schatz, April 6, 2018

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Couple Blames Contractor For Asbestos Exposure Danger

Any South Carolina reader who plans on doing some home renovation this year may want to pay close attention to this story, especially if the home in question has popcorn ceilings. This type of ceiling is a texturized design that often poses a major asbestos exposure risk if it is scraped. A family in another state hired a contractor to remove the popcorn ceiling in a particular area of their home.

The basic home renovation situation turned disastrous when homeowners discovered spilled debris throughout their house. They immediately had their property tested, which resulted in inspectors listing their home as a serious asbestos spill. This caused the family to have to evacuate. Thankfully, extended family members provided the couple and their two young children temporary shelter.

The homeowners were distraught, saying the contractor, who claims he had worked with asbestos many times in the past, should have taken appropriate precautions to keep their home as safe as possible. The contractor reportedly blamed the homeowners, saying they had started renovations before he arrived on the job. The family lost nearly everything they owned.

A fund-raising page was opened online to help the family obtain money to cover expenses associated with the asbestos removal process that would be needed. They also need funds to replace their belongings so they can move back into their home once inspectors say the asbestos exposure risk has been eradicated.  When there are insurance complications and legal problems associated with such situations in South Carolina, it’s often helpful for those involved to seek experienced support, especially if a particular case leads to litigation.

Source: Littleton, CO Patch, “Asbestos Renovation Nightmare For Littleton Family“, Jean Lotus, April 2, 2018

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Toxicology Studies Show Concern Similar to Asbestos Exposure

South Carolina residents, especially those who work in factories, old school buildings or other potential areas of risk, may be concerned about certain health-related symptoms they suspect may be related to their jobs. For instance, those who know they have endured asbestos exposure may be especially worried about various respiratory illnesses or cancers associated with such circumstances. Although there are currently strict regulations regarding asbestos removal, recent news suggests there are actually newer products that pose as much of a risk to human health as asbestos.

Toxicology reports show mice have contracted mesothelioma cancer when exposed to carbon Nanotubes. Commonly referred to as CNTs, such products are often used to manufacture television sets, computer components, automobiles and various types of sports equipment. In the past, mesothelioma was most directly related to exposure to asbestos, actually comprised of six different types of micro fiber materials that are released into the atmosphere under certain conditions.

CNTs apparently have a similar effect on human health. These materials are often chosen to manufacture certain products because of their tensile strength, which is many times higher than steel. Recent scientific studies show that CNTs may be just as dangerous to workers and consumers as asbestos.

Asbestos has been banned in many countries. Asbestos exposure risk still exists in the United States, and anyone in South Carolina or beyond who experienced adverse health symptoms they believe may be related to asbestos can reach out for support from medical, as well as legal advocates. Time will tell whether CNTs undergo bans similar to asbestos; until then, those who suffer injury due to others’ negligence may pursue claims for recovery for their financial losses through the civil justice system.

Source: technologynetworks.com, “Are Carbon Nanotubes a New Asbestos?“, Ruairi MacKenzie, March 28, 2018

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Are Cornell students at risk for asbestos exposure?

Many South Carolina college campuses have buildings that contain asbestos. The dangers associated with asbestos exposure are well-known. A university in another state, however, claims its students, faculty and visitors have no reason for concern even though there are active asbestos abatement projects happening at the school.

A director of occupational health and safety at the university said there are often asbestos removal projects ongoing at the school. There are apparently warning signs posted in various locations on campus that designate certain entry ways for authorized personnel only. The signs, which are red and black, also state that entry requires use of protective clothing and respiratory equipment.

Those reading the warning signs on the Cornell University campus may also notice warnings that asbestos causes lung damage and cancer. As per the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, all schools and public companies are required to regularly test asbestos levels in their facilities. Many Cornell students say they are worried about the possible health risks associated with being on campus while active asbestos removal projects are taking place.

If a person suffers illness from asbestos exposure on a college campus in South Carolina or elsewhere, it may be months or years before a formal diagnosis is given. Such situations can be very stressful, and most people need outside support to help them get the care they need. Part of that care often includes legal assistance to seek recovery for their losses in court. Compensation awarded by the court for damages can be used to help offset medical bills and other expenses associated with an asbestos-related illness.

Source: cornellsun.com, “Cornell Asbestos Abatement Projects Strive to Remove Carcinogen from Campus“, Amanda H. Cronin, Accessed on March 15, 2018

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Textured Paint May Create Asbestos Exposure Risk

Many South Carolina dwellings contain health hazards due to types of paint or other products used to decorate. In fact, some homes that contain paint from the 1980s, or earlier, place residents and visitors at risk for asbestos exposure. This can pose a complicated legal situation if residents of an apartment or other complex rent their homes, then contract asbestos-related illnesses because of paint or other materials used in the buildings.

This is what happened in another state where textured paint was used to create a decorating style known as popcorn ceilings. Sadly, there was a building fire in the apartment complex. In the aftermath of the incident building contractors reported that asbestos was found.

After contractors announced their findings, an asbestos removal process began. Removal occurred in a laundry room, community area and at least 27 apartments. Additional reports state that there are higher floor levels in the building that still contain asbestos. Surprisingly, even though the asbestos removal project has not yet been completed throughout the entire building, some residents have been allowed to move back into their apartments from which they had been displaced because of the fire.

One asbestos contractor working on the project said anyone living in a home that contains paint from the 1980s or older (and possibly some in the early 1990s) should think about having their residences tested for asbestos. There are currently thousands of people in South Carolina and many other states who suffer incurable illnesses because of asbestos exposure. Such situations often lead to litigation because employer or others’ negligence are often causal factors to asbestos-related diseases.

Source: actionnewsjax.com, “Popcorn ceilings were source of asbestos in Jacksonville Townhouse Apartments“, Jenna Bourne, March 12, 2018

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Lawmakers in Another State Say Change Needed Re Asbestos Exposure

Demolition often creates dangerous situations regarding possible health risks involved with certain projects, especially for those workers involved in tearing down old buildings. In one state, there are approximately 40,000 dilapidated structures awaiting the wrecking ball in a particular city. Whether in South Carolina or elsewhere, such jobs often place workers at great risk for asbestos exposure, which can result in respiratory infections or even a fatal disease.

Lawmakers in that state are proposing changes that would better protect residents and workers from the dangers of asbestos. One of the suggestions is to obligate public agencies to perform background checks before hiring abatement contractors. Legislators also want funds allocated to the state environmental agency (via fees) that could be used to hire additional asbestos inspectors.

New laws would also require the state’s Department of Environmental Quality to file annual reports on asbestos inspectors. Many of these legislative proposals were apparently prompted by a widespread problem regarding unlicensed abatement contractors, poorly trained workers and insufficient safety equipment throughout Michigan, the state in which the legislation has been proposed. One estimate states that there have been at least 4,000 asbestos violations in the state within seven years.

Asbestos exposure is a serious concern for many South Carolina construction workers as well as other people who worry about various products or situations that may place their health at risk. Several illnesses associated with asbestos exposure have no known cures. Anyone in this state currently considering litigation regarding an asbestos situation can request guidance from an experienced personal injury attorney.

Source: constructionequipment.com, “Michigan Moves to Get Tough With Asbestos Removal Contractors”, Feb. 21, 2018

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Where Does your Job Lie on Asbestos Exposure Risk Lists?

Dangers associated with asbestos have been well known for a long time now. That doesn’t necessarily guarantee all workers and homeowners from potential asbestos exposure risks, however, as many people (including some in South Carolina) continue to live and work in high-risk zones. To be as fully informed as possible, it’s helpful to research what types of jobs are most dangerous when it comes to asbestos-related injuries and illnesses.

Asbestos is often used in brake linings and clutch mechanisms of automobiles, thus placing auto mechanics at great risk for injury. Construction workers, especially drywall installers, are also reportedly at risk for possible illness related to asbestos at higher rates than the general population. Railroad workers, miners and even teachers (especially those using art supplies containing asbestos) rank high on asbestos risk lists as well.

Asbestos is most dangerous when its microscopic particles are released into the air and then ingested by those nearby. However, it can also be extremely dangerous to be exposed to asbestos on a second-hand basis, such as when a family member who works near asbestos comes home wearing work clothes. The symptoms of such illnesses often do not present themselves for many months or years following initial exposures.

South Carolina residents who work in or live with someone who works in shipyards, factories, plumbing or public service jobs, such as firefighting, are among those throughout the nation at greatest risk for asbestos exposure illnesses. When diagnoses are made, patients are often already in the late stages of their conditions. An experienced personal injury attorney can be an important asset to those in asbestos-related situations who wish to pursue compensation for damages caused by other parties’ negligence.

Source: asbestosnetwork.com, “Asbestos High-Risk Occupations“, Accessed on Feb. 19, 2018

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Steps Taken to Protect Public from Asbestos Exposure

In 1943, a  memorial visitor center was opened in another state to greet visitors interested in learning more about the childhood of Abraham Lincoln. The Lincoln Boyhood National Memorial preserves the farm land where the former president lived in the early to mid 1800s. The visitor center, located on the grounds, is slated to be closed from February through mid-March to protect people from possible asbestos exposure. Similar projects may be scheduled in some older South Carolina buildings as well.

In addition to the visitor center, the museum, bookstore and auditorium are also being shut down to the general public. Officials say the closings are meant to optimize staff and visitor safety during an asbestos removal project on the grounds. Two nearby memorial halls, however, will remain open during certain hours where people can view videos and temporary displays. The public will also still be able to hike along trails located in the park.

The purpose of the project is reportedly is to remove an asbestos-laden ceiling in preparation of a future fire suppression system slated for installation down the line. Those who have worked with asbestos in the past may understand the potentially grave dangers associated with such projects. Asbestos-related dangers are so well-known that employers are obligated to inform their workers of possible exposures on the job.

Employers must also provide proper training and safety equipment to help minimize risk of injury or illness associated with construction projects or any other type of work that exposes employees to asbestos. Employer negligence can have disastrous consequences. In fact, there are experienced South Carolina attorneys who remain fully prepared to litigate claims brought to court by those injured from on-the-job asbestos exposure.

Source: duboiscountyfreepress.com, “Lincoln Boyhood National Memorial asbestos removal impacting parts of Memorial Visitor Center“, Feb. 14, 2018

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts

Legal Claim Filed Citing Wrongful Death by Asbestos Exposure

Following a South Carolina man’s death, a special administrator of his estate has filed a lawsuit against several parties. The claim states that the man’s employer and other defendants should be held legally accountable for his death. A central focus of the case is that the man’s death was associated with asbestos exposure; the estate administrator is hoping to obtain compensation for damages due to the defendants’ alleged negligence.

The man had worked at the same company for approximately 37 years from the 1970s to the early 2000s. During that time, it is asserted he was repeatedly exposed to dangerous levels of asbestos. In fact, it is alleged that ingestion of the microscopic particles caused his lung cancer, which ultimately led to his untimely death.

The plaintiff claims that the defendants could have used available substitute products rather than those that included asbestos fibers. She says not only did they not choose available adequate substitutes, they also failed to warn the employee or provide proper instruction regarding possible asbestos exposure and the known dangers of working with such products. The plaintiff is seeking punitive damages as well as compensatory damages exceeding $50,000.

As many other South Carolina plaintiffs have done in the past, the estate administrator is relying on legal representation to present her case in court. Asbestos exposure litigation is often complicated and stressful. Having an experienced attorney by one’s side often helps keep stress levels to a minimum. Also, an attorney’s keen insight and aggressive assistance is often crucial toward achieving a successful outcome.

Source: madisonrecord.com, “Administrator alleges South Carolina man’s lung cancer death due to asbestos exposure“, Lhalie Castillo, Feb. 5, 2018

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

Contact Us

Case Types

Related Posts